Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338721›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2019

Mesh erosion after hiatal hernia repair: the tip of the iceberg?

J Li, T Cheng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of mesh reinforced cruroplasty with Phasix™ ST vs. Bio-AHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. When helpful becomes harmful: a case-based narrative review of esophageal mesh migration after hiatal hernia repair.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. One-year outcomes of biological mesh in hiatal hernia repair: a real-world study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Robotic hiatal hernia repair without mesh.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024
    Article
  16. ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF MESH MIGRATION FOLLOWING HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comment to: Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J LiDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China. Lijunshenghd@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4422-9654
T ChengDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary repair of large hiatal hernia is associated with a high recurrence rate, which has led to the use of mesh for crural repair. However, severe mesh-related complications, including esophageal or gastric erosion, have been observed.

methodsIn the present study, we made a thorough identification of all published reports on the esophageal or gastric mesh erosion or migration after hiatal hernia repair. The incidence, site, mesh type, latent interval, consequence and treatment methods of mesh erosion were summarized and analyzed.

resultsA total of 50 cases of esophageal or gastric mesh erosion or migration after hiatal hernia repair were reported since 1998. A higher erosion rate was observed in recurrent hiatal hernia repair. The most common erosion site was esophagus (50%), followed by stomach (25%) and gastric-esophageal junction (GEJ) (23%). The most common mesh types reported in this series were PTEF and polypropylene. The duration from the hernia repair to the identification of erosion varied greatly, and 79% of the erosion occurred within 2 years after the hernia repair. Various treatment methods were reported, including endoscopic mesh retrieval (15.7%), laparoscopic mesh removal (11.8%), surgical mesh removal (19.6%); however, distal esophageal resection and gastric resection were reported in 19.6% and 5.9%, respectively. Some patients had to receive tube feeding.

conclusionThe true incidence of mesh erosion after hiatal hernia repair may be higher than previously reported, and the erosion is more prone to occur after recurrent hiatal hernia repair. Mesh erosion can result in severe morbidity and sometimes require complex organ resection. Different kinds and shapes of prosthetic meshes can cause erosion; therefore, mesh should be used very selectively for hiatal hernia repair. The patient should be informed about the mesh placement and the possible mesh-related complications.

Indexed as

AdultDevice RemovalEsophageal DiseasesEsophagusFemaleForeign-Body MigrationHernia, HiatalHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis FailureRecurrenceStomachStomach DiseasesSurgical MeshComplicationErosionHiatal herniaMeshMigrationParaesophageal hernia

Identifiers

PMID31338721
OpenAlexW2963128385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.