Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338709›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2020

Machine Learning Methods for Optimal Radiomics-Based Differentiation Between Recurrence and Inflammation: Application to Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Post-therapy PET/CT Images.

Dongyang Du, Hui Feng, Wenbing Lv, Saeed Ashrafinia, Qingyu Yuan, Quanshi Wang, Wei Yang, Qianjin Feng, Wufan Chen, Arman Rahmim and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Applying deep learning-based ensemble model to [Japanese journal of radiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. ExplainableJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Surgery.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  11. Role ofCancers · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dongyang DuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Hui FengSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Wenbing LvSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Saeed AshrafiniaDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Qingyu YuanNanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Quanshi WangNanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Wei YangSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Qianjin FengSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Wufan ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Arman RahmimDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Lijun LuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. ljlubme@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7001-4892

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify optimal machine learning methods for radiomics-based differentiation of local recurrence versus inflammation from post-treatment nasopharyngeal positron emission tomography/X-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) images. PROCEDURES: Seventy-six nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients were enrolled (41/35 local recurrence/inflammation as confirmed by pathology). Four hundred eighty-seven radiomics features were extracted from PET images for each patient. The diagnostic performance was investigated for 42 cross-combinations derived from 6 feature selection methods and 7 classifiers. Of the original cohort, 70 % was applied for feature selection and classifier development, and the remaining 30 % used as an independent validation set. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using area under the ROC curve (AUC), test error, sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, the performance of the radiomics signatures against routine features was statistically compared using DeLong's method.

resultsThe cross-combination fisher score (FSCR) + k-nearest neighborhood (KNN), FSCR + support vector machines with radial basis function kernel (RBF-SVM), FSCR + random forest (RF), and minimum redundancy maximum relevance (MRMR) + RBF-SVM outperformed others in terms of accuracy (AUC 0.883, 0.867, 0.892, 0.883; sensitivity 0.833, 0.864, 0.831, 0.750; specificity 1, 1, 0.873, 1) and reliability (test error 0.091, 0.136, 0.150, 0.136). Compared with conventional metrics, the radiomics signatures showed higher AUC values (0.867-0.892 vs. 0.817), though the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.462-0.560).

conclusionThis study identified the most accurate and reliable machine learning methods, which could enhance the application of radiomics methods in the precision of diagnosis of NPC.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInflammationMaleNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveDiagnosisMachine learningNasopharyngeal carcinomaPET/CTRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.