ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2019
[Fractures and bone mineral density in childhood].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physical Activity and Bone Vascularization: A Way to Explore in Bone Repair Context?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- [Rehabilitation of orphan diseases in adulthood: osteogenesis imperfecta].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn juvenile idiopathic arthritis and related chronic inflammatory diseases, proinflammatory cytokines inhibit bone formation and stimulate bone resorption. Anti-inflammatory drugs, such as glucocorticoids and nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs (NSARD) have as a side effect the potential to inhibit growth and maintenance of bone. These issues are of particular importance for the growing skeleton in childhood and adolescence.
objectiveThis article presents a narrative overview about the dimension of the problem, a critical evaluation of diagnostic procedures and a discussion of available countermeasures.
methodsA systematic literature search was carried out and the available evidence was evaluated based on the authors' knowledge and clinical experience as experts in the field. RESULTS AND
conclusionIn recent years solid data have been accumulated with respect to the interpretation of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in children and adolescents. Based on these data from the literature and given that the radiation exposure is also very low, it is now possible to clinically apply BMD measurements in this population using dual energy X‑ray absorption (DXA) technology for risk evaluation and diagnosis, taking the respective phase of development and body length into consideration. Dynamic measurements over time appear to be especially valuable in the context of individual clinical data. Hence, BMD measurements can be helpful in monitoring bone health, especially in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and other related inflammatory diseases. Apart from the specific indications for extended diagnostics and bone targeted pharmacological treatment, this method can also contribute to the management of preventive measures, such as sufficient calcium and vitamin D intake and targeted exercise interventions. Even in times of extremely effective antirheumatic drugs, children with chronic inflammatory diseases still bear a risk for bone health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.