ArticleAMB Express2019
Production of β-1,3-glucanase and chitosanase from clostridial strains isolated from the soil subjected to biological disinfestation.
Article in AMB Express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biocontrol effect of a solid-state fermentation-derived extract mixture ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Biocontrol Potential and Functional Characteristics ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biocontrol potential of a native fungi and actinomyces collection against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 causing fusarium wilt disease on cavendish banana in Southern Vietnam.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
- Screening of endophytic fungi from Cremastra appendiculata and their potential for plant growth promotion and biological control.Folia microbiologica · 2023Article
- Article
- A set of simple methods for detection and extraction of laminarinase.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- β-1,3-Glucanase production as an anti-fungal enzyme by phylogenetically different strains of the genus Clostridium isolated from anoxic soil that underwent biological disinfestation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Biological soil disinfestation (BSD) or anaerobic (reductive) soil disinfestation (ASD/RSD) is a bioremediation method used to eliminate soil-borne plant pathogens by exploiting the activities of anaerobic bacteria in soil. In this study, two obligate anaerobic bacterial strains isolated from BSD-treated soil and identified as Clostridium beijerinckii were examined for their abilities to suppress the spinach wilt disease pathogen (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. spinaciae) as a representative soil-borne fungal plant pathogen. Both strains degraded β-1,3-glucan and chitosan, two major polysaccharide components of ascomycetes fungal cell wall, supplemented in the medium. β-1,3-Glucanase was detected in the supernatants of cultures supplemented with different types of glucan. Similarly, chitosanase was detected in cultures supplemented with chitosan. Both the enzyme activities were also detected in cultures containing glucose as a substrate. Live cells of F. oxysporum f. sp. spinaciae that were co-incubated with each anaerobic strain under anaerobic conditions using glucose as a substrate died during incubation. Freeze-dried dead fungal biomass of the pathogen, when added to the culture, supported good growth of both anaerobes and production of both enzymes. Severe and nearly complete degradation of both live and dead fungal cells during incubation with anaerobic bacteria was observed by fluorescence microscopy. When individual anaerobic bacterial strain was co-incubated with live pathogenic fungal cells in wheat bran, a popular material for BSD-treatment, both the strains grew well and killed the fungal pathogen promptly by producing both enzymes. These results indicate that both the bacterial strains attack the fungal cells by releasing extracellular fungal cell wall-degrading enzymes, thereby eliminating the pathogen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.