Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338583›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2019

Appearance-related psychosocial distress following facial skin cancer surgery using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer.

Toral S Vaidya, Shoko Mori, Stephen W Dusza, Anthony M Rossi, Kishwer S Nehal, Erica H Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Effectiveness of PELNACAesthetic plastic surgery · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Psychometric properties of four FACE-Q Aesthetics scales in patients planning and undergoing minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Toral S VaidyaDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 16 E. 60th Street, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Shoko MoriDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 16 E. 60th Street, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Stephen W DuszaDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 16 E. 60th Street, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Anthony M RossiDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 16 E. 60th Street, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Kishwer S NehalDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 16 E. 60th Street, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Erica H LeeDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 16 E. 60th Street, New York, NY, 10022, USA. leee@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 2 million facial skin cancers occur globally each year. Facial skin cancer surgery can leave scars that may alter appearance and impact psychosocial functioning. The objective of this study is to assess patient-reported appearance-related psychosocial distress following facial skin cancer surgery, and to identify independent predictors of psychosocial impairment. This was a single-center, cross-sectional study at a tertiary care cancer center including patients who underwent dermatologic surgery on the face from March 1, 2016 to March 31, 2018. Patients completed the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Appearance-related Psychosocial Distress scale postoperatively between May 21, 2018 and October 1, 2018. Patient responses were rated on a 4-point Likert scale and converted on a scale from 0 to 100. In total, 359 patients completed the questionnaire (34.2% response rate). Overall, patients reported a low level of psychosocial distress. Patients most frequently reported items of self-consciousness, unhappiness, and insecurity < 3 months following surgery. Though psychosocial distress significantly improved over time, self-consciousness continued to be reported in the long-term postoperative period. Linear regression analysis determined that younger age, history of anxiety and/or depression, surgery on the nose, and repair by flap were independently predictive of psychosocial distress. Marginal predicted values for distress scores based on age demonstrated an indirect relationship. Patient-reported appearance-related psychosocial distress is low following facial skin cancer surgery, and report of distress decreases over time. The identified predictors of distress may be used as indicators for offering psycho-oncologic support and early interventions to improve scar appearance.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsCicatrixConsciousnessCross-Sectional StudiesDermatologic Surgical ProceduresFaceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Appearance, BodyPsychometricsQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSkin NeoplasmsFACE-Q Skin CancerPatient-reported outcomesPsychosocial distressSkin cancer surgery

Identifiers

PMID31338583
PMCPMC7474556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.