Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338547›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Quality of life in patients with midgut NET following peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Milka Marinova, Martin Mücke, Felix Fischer, Markus Essler, Henning Cuhls, Lukas Radbruch, Shiwa Ghaei, Rupert Conrad, Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Navigating care: understanding cancer patients' experiences with systemic radionuclide therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy UsingWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milka MarinovaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martin MückeDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Felix FischerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Markus EsslerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Henning CuhlsDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lukas RadbruchDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Shiwa GhaeiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rupert ConradDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hojjat AhmadzadehfarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. hojjat.ahmadzadehfar@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0393-5309
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is convincing evidence that peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using MATERIALS AND

methodsIn our study, 70 patients (39 men or 31 female) suffering from midgut NET were included, with a mean age of 64.2 years. Functional performance was assessed by the index of the Eastern Cooperative of Oncology Group (ECOG). Thirty-three patients (47%) showed ECOG 0, 31 patients (44%) ECOG 1, and six patients (9%) ECOG 2. Health-related QoL was assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire filled in at baseline and 3 months after each PRRT cycle.

resultsThe median cumulative administered activity was 27.4 GBq. Global health status significantly improved compared to baseline status after 1st (p = 0.05), 2nd (p = 0.004), and 3rd (p = 0.04) treatment cycle. Analyzing specific aspects of QoL, emotional functioning significantly improved after 1st and 2nd treatment cycle (both p < 0.001) as well as after 3rd cycle (p = 0.001). With regard to cognitive functioning, there was a significant improvement after 1st and 2nd treatment cycle (p = 0.003 and p = 0.05 respectively). With regard to alleviation of somatic symptoms, a significant reduction in pain and diarrhea was observed after the 2nd cycle (p = 0.038) and 3rd cycle (p = 0.036). Furthermore, changes in QoL in relation to functional performance status as assessed by ECOG were analyzed. There were no significant differences with regard to QoL alterations between patients with high (ECOG 0 or 1) and moderate performance status.

conclusionOur study confirmed an equally positive effect of PRRT on quality of life in midgut NET patients with high or moderate functional status in terms of increasing global health, functional status, and alleviating symptoms.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Peptidelutetium Lu 177 dotatateOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Peptide177LU-DOTATATEMIDGUT NETPRRTQOL

Identifiers

PMID31338547
OpenAlexW2963657976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.