ReviewDer Radiologe2019
[Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma : Importance of diagnostic imaging].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CLINICAL
backgroundIf pheochromocytoma (PC) or paraganglioma (PGL) is diagnosed based on serologic studies, imaging is required to locate the adrenal mass for further management. Besides pathognomonic hormonal findings, PC/PGL can exhibit typical imaging features. However, PC/PGL can also show morphological overlap with other pathologies. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsThe modality of choice for evaluation of PC is CT. In case of extra-adrenal location, MRI is superior to CT. Imaging with PET-CT provides complementary information in the differentiation of PC/PGL and is recommended as the imaging modality of choice for malignant PC/PGL. METHODICAL DETAILS: The CT protocol for PC evaluation should include non-enhanced, arterial, portal-venous and late phases; the latter for the evaluation of wash-out. Recent studies indicate non-enhanced CT alone may be sufficient to rule out PC. For MRI, in- and opposed-phase sequences should be additionally acquired. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: A relevant proportion of PC is diagnosed incidentally. Therefore, imaging of PC will gain further importance. Recent studies show better response rates of PC/PGL after radioreceptor therapy with somatostatin analogues (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.