Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338503›Full record

ArticleFaraday discussions2019

Factors contributing to variability of glycan microarray binding profiles.

J Sebastian Temme, Christopher T Campbell, Jeffrey C Gildersleeve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Faraday discussions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Serum antibody screening using glycan arrays.Chemical Society reviews · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. LectinOracle: A Generalizable Deep Learning Model for Lectin-Glycan Binding Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Sebastian TemmeChemical Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. gildersj@mail.nih.gov.
Christopher T Campbell
Jeffrey C Gildersleeve

Funding

Structural Basis of Immune Recognition of Glycosylated AntigensU54GM062116 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI ALVAREZ, RICHARD · 2001 to 2010
$80.3M
Carbohydrate Microarray Profiling of Glycan-Binding Antibodies and LectinsZIABC010740 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GILDERSLEEVE, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2025
$10.7M
Development of a Carbohydrate MicroarrayZIABC010675 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GILDERSLEEVE, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2025
$6.1M
Carbohydrate Microarray Profiling of Glycan-Binding Antibodies and LectinsZ01BC010740 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GILDERSLEEVE, JEFF · 2006 to 2008
$747k
Development of a Carbohydrate MicroarrayZ01BC010675 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GILDERSLEEVE, JEFF · 2005 to 2008
$438k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010675Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010740NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM062116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-carbohydrate interactions play significant roles in a wide variety of biological systems. Glycan microarrays are commonly utilized to interrogate the selectivity, sensitivity, and breadth of these complex protein-carbohydrate interactions. During the past two decades, numerous distinct glycan microarray platforms have been developed, each assembled from a variety of slide-surface chemistries, glycan-attachment chemistries, glycan presentations, linkers, and glycan densities. Comparative analyses of glycan microarray data have shown that while many protein-carbohydrate interactions behave predictably across microarrays, there are instances when various array formats produce different results. For optimal construction and use of this technology, it is important to understand sources of variances across array platforms. In this study, we performed a systematic comparison of microarray data from 8 lectins across a range of concentrations on the CFG and neoglycoprotein array platforms. While there was good general agreement on the binding specificity of the lectins on the two arrays, there were some cases of large discrepancies. Differences in glycan density and linker composition contributed significantly to variability. The results provide insights for interpreting microarray data and designing future glycan microarrays.

Indexed as

AnimalsLectinsMicroarray AnalysisModels, MolecularPolysaccharidesProtein BindingLectinsPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID31338503
PMCPMC9335900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.