ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2019
Safety and efficacy in actual clinical practice of once-weekly subcutaneous teriparatide for osteoporosis patients with a high fracture risk.
Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized crossover comparison of two teriparatide self-injection regimens for primary osteoporosis: final report of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06).Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2025Trial
- Efficacy of once-weekly teriparatide in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: the TOWER-GO study.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2021Trial
- Efficacy of once-weekly teriparatide versus alendronate in Chinese postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomised, open-label, active-controlled, 48-week, multicentre phase III study.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Osteosarcopenia and Pain: Do We Have a Way Out?Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Expansion of the osteocytic lacunar-canalicular system involved in pharmacological action of PTH revealed by AI-driven fluorescence morphometry in female rabbits.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- How different is the once-weekly teriparatide from the daily one or the same?Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo reassess the safety and efficacy of once-weekly teriparatide 56.5 μg in osteoporosis patients with a high fracture risk.
methodsThis postmarketing observational study was conducted at 72 weeks according to the package insert. Of the 3573 Japanese osteoporosis patients in the safety analysis set, 91.80% were women, the mean age was 78.1 years, and 69.89% had a history of prevalent fragility fractures, indicating that a high proportion of patients at high risk of fracture were enrolled.
resultsPersistence with weekly teriparatide treatment was 59.36%, and 38.95% at 24 and 72 weeks, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 898 patients (25.13%), and serious ADRs were reported in 26 patients (0.73%). The most frequent ADRs were nausea, vomiting, and headache. The cumulative incidence of new vertebral fractures 72 weeks after the start of treatment was 3.31%. Increases in the bone mineral density were observed in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and proximal femur. The serum levels of the bone formation markers, procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and bone-type alkaline phosphatase, increased slightly at 24 weeks and then decreased to baseline levels. At 24 and 72 weeks, the bone resorption markers, serum cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, were the same as or slightly lower than at baseline. Visual analogue scale scores for low back pain also decreased.
conclusionsThe present results showed that once-weekly teriparatide may also be useful for osteoporosis patients with a high risk of fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.