Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338368›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2019

Evaluation of Community-Based Dog Welfare and Rabies Project in Sanur, a Sub-district of the Indonesian Island Province of Bali.

Ni Wayan Arya Utami, Kadek Karang Agustina, Kathryn Nattrass Atema, Gusti Ngurah Bagus, Janice Girardi, Mike Harfoot, Yacinta Haryono, Lex Hiby, Hendra Irawan, Pande Putu Januraga and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ni Wayan Arya UtamiDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Kadek Karang AgustinaDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Kathryn Nattrass AtemaInternational Fund for Animal Welfare, Yarmouth Port, MA, United States.
Gusti Ngurah BagusBali Animal Welfare Association (BAWA), Ubud, Indonesia.
Janice GirardiBali Animal Welfare Association (BAWA), Ubud, Indonesia.
Mike HarfootIndependent Researcher, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Yacinta HaryonoBali Animal Welfare Association (BAWA), Ubud, Indonesia.
Lex HibyConservation Research Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hendra IrawanBali Animal Welfare Association (BAWA), Ubud, Indonesia.
Pande Putu JanuragaDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Levin KalaloBali Animal Welfare Association (BAWA), Ubud, Indonesia.
Sang Gede PurnamaDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
I Made SubrataDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Ida Bagus Ngurah SwacitaDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
I Made Indrayadnya SwarayanaBali Animal Welfare Association (BAWA), Ubud, Indonesia.
Dewa Nyoman WirawanDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Elly HibyInternational Fund for Animal Welfare, Yarmouth Port, MA, United States.
Udayana University · IDBali Animal Welfare Association · IDInternational Fund for Animal Welfare · USConservation Leadership Programme · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Indonesian island province of Bali experienced its first rabies incursion in 2008. Mass vaccination of the dog population has proven effective and rabies cases in dogs and people have decreased, however the virus is still circulating among the dog population. Vaccination coverage must be maintained until rabies elimination. Increasing efficiency and effectiveness of vaccination campaigns is therefore desired. Community engagement leading to preventative health actions by community members can reduce disease incidence and costs of control. Here we evaluate 2 years of a novel community-based dog welfare and rabies control project (Program Dharma) in the Sanur sub-district. The project engaged the services of people living in the project area with an interest or experience in dogs or community health services. These people spoke with owners within their own community about dog welfare and health, monitored owned and unowned dogs and increased owner and carer efforts to access vaccination and further veterinary services. The evaluation focused on a sample of dogs whose owners had been regularly engaged with project. Vaccination coverage was increased and there were no dog or human rabies cases reported in the project area; the percentage of the dogs that had never been vaccinated was reduced by an average 28.3% (baseline unvaccinated 41-49%, post-project unvaccinated 11-19%). The welfare of dogs improved from an average of 20.7% of dogs with visible welfare problems at baseline to 2.7% after project implementation. Roaming dog density observed on street surveys also decreased in all project areas (24-47% reduction dependent on

Indexed as

animal welfareBalicaninecommunity engagementdograbiesvaccination

Identifiers

PMID31338368
PMCPMC6629783
OpenAlexW2960731115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.