Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338295›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2019

Zoonotic nematodes of wild carnivores.

Domenico Otranto, Peter Deplazes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Geographical Distribution and Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Gastrointestinal helminth parasites of urban and rural foxes around Melbourne, Australia.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  16. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  17. Circulation ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Domenico OtrantoDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Universita' degli Studi di Bari, 70010, Valenzano, Italy.
Peter DeplazesInstitute of Parasitology, University of Zürich, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a long time, wildlife carnivores have been disregarded for their potential in transmitting zoonotic nematodes. However, human activities and politics (e.g., fragmentation of the environment, land use, recycling in urban settings) have consistently favoured the encroachment of urban areas upon wild environments, ultimately causing alteration of many ecosystems with changes in the composition of the wild fauna and destruction of boundaries between domestic and wild environments. Therefore, the exchange of parasites from wild to domestic carnivores and vice versa have enhanced the public health relevance of wild carnivores and their potential impact in the epidemiology of many zoonotic parasitic diseases. The risk of transmission of zoonotic nematodes from wild carnivores to humans via food, water and soil (e.g., genera

Indexed as

BaylisascarisCapillariaDirofilariaNematodesOnchocercaParasitic zoonosisThelaziaToxocaraTrichinellaWild carnivores

Identifiers

PMID31338295
PMCPMC6626844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.