ArticleMovement ecology2019
Black bears alter movements in response to anthropogenic features with time of day and season.
Article in Movement ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compound food failure on a deteriorated mast system drives Japan's bear conflict crisis.Science advances · 2026Article
- Anthropogenic Infrastructures Shape Brown Bear Movements in Human-Modified Landscapes.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- White-Tailed Deer Baiting Altered Black Bear Site Use but Not Movements or Range Size.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- The Intentional and Unintentional Human Food Subsidy Landscape for a Large Carnivore.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.Movement ecology · 2024Article
- Free amino acid and acylcarnitine values in Ursus americanus Pallas 1780 (black bear) from Northeastern Mexico.PloS one · 2023Article
- The Landscape of Fear as a Safety Eco-Field: Experimental Evidence.Biosemiotics · 2023Article
- Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdowns.Conservation science and practice · 2022Article
- Personality as a Predictor of Time-Activity Budget in Lion-Tailed Macaques (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Environmental and anthropogenic influences on movement and foraging in a critically endangered lemur species, Propithecus tattersalli: implications for habitat conservation planning.Movement ecology · 2022Article
- Article
- Linking behavioral states to landscape features for improved conservation management.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Group density, disease, and season shape territory size and overlap of social carnivores.The Journal of animal ecology · 2021Article
- Article
- Seasonal and daily shifts in behavior and resource selection: how a carnivore navigates costly landscapes.Oecologia · 2020Article
- Movement behaviour of two social urticating caterpillars in opposite hemispheres.Movement ecology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the growth and expansion of human development, large mammals will increasingly encounter humans, elevating the likelihood of human-wildlife conflicts. Understanding the behavior and movement of large mammals, particularly around human development, is important for crafting effective conservation and management plans for these species.
methodsWe used GPS collar data from American black bears (
resultsWe found that though bears moved more and avoided human development during crepuscular and daylight hours than at night, bears preferentially moved through human dominated areas at night. This indicates bears were mitigating the risk of human development by altering their behavior to exploit these areas when human activity is low. This behavioral shift was most prominent in the spring, when natural foods are scarce, and fall, when energetic demands are high. We also observed a high degree of inter-individual variability among our sample of bears. Bears with a higher density of houses in their home ranges (~ 75 houses/km2) displayed less avoidance of human development than more rural bears. Furthermore, bear movement models had different explanatory variables, with preference or avoidance of a variable being dependent on the individual bear. To account for this individuality in our predictive surfaces, we projected the probability of movement for each season and time of day using a spatially weighted surface centered on each bear's home range.
conclusionsWe found that black bears in Massachusetts are operating in a landscape of fear and are altering their movement patterns to use developed areas when human activity is low. We also found seasonal and diel differences among individual bears in resource selection during movement. Accounting for these individual, seasonal, and diel differences when assessing movement for large mammals is especially important if predictive surfaces are to be used in identifying areas for conservation and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.