ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Cross-Wavelet Time-Frequency Analysis Reveals Sympathetic Contribution to Baroreflex Sensitivity as Cause of Variable Phase Delay Between Blood Pressure and Heart Rate.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baroreflex sensitivity impairment in Long-COVID patients: a diagnostic tool for classifying the autonomic dysfunction spectrum.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- An open computational toolbox to analyze multi- and single-unit sympathetic nerve activity in microneurography.Biophysics reviews · 2024Article
- Correlation between night sweats and season fluctuation in China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- The Effect of Skeletal Muscle-Pump on Blood Pressure and Postural Control in Parkinson's Disease.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2023Article
- Impact of daily artificial gravity on autonomic cardiovascular control following 60-day head-down tilt bed rest.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Cardiac Electrophysiological and Haemodynamic Effects ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Novel Method for Baroreflex Sensitivity Estimation Using Modulated Gaussian Filter.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Advanced Cross-Correlation Function Application to Identify Arterial Baroreflex Sensitivity Variations From Healthy to Diabetes Mellitus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Beyond the Baroreflex: A New Measure of Autonomic Regulation Based on the Time-Frequency Assessment of Variability, Phase Coherence and Couplings.Frontiers in network physiology · 2022Article
- Effect of Parkinson's Disease on Cardio-postural Coupling During Orthostatic Challenge.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Blood Pressure Drop Rate After Standing Up Is Associated With Frailty and Number of Falls in Geriatric Outpatients.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBaroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is often presented as a single number, but it is actually a frequency-dependent phenomenon whose value changes constantly due to internal and external stimuli. The standing posture, for instance, necessitates a changeover from vagal to sympathetic predominance for cardiovascular control. We present a wavelet cross-spectral analysis of blood pressure (BP) and interbeat interval (IBI) recordings in the search for variations in gain and phase between these signals. Additionally, we show how the lag in sympathetic response dictates BP-to-IBI phase relations.
methodsRecordings in supine and head-up tilted (HUT) position, obtained earlier in 10 healthy subjects (4f/6m, aged 27-47 years) were used. BP and IBI were measured from the continuous finger pressure (by Finometer). The cross-wavelet analysis produced time- and frequency dependent gain (wBRS, wavelet derived BRS) and phase, using the MATLAB
resultsIn resting supine conditions, wBRS fluctuates; more at respiratory frequencies than in the 0.1 Hz band. After HUT, wBRS at the respiratory frequency decreases from average 22.7 to 8.5 ms/mmHg, phase between BP and IBI increases from -30° to -54°; in the sympathetic 0.1 Hz range these numbers are 13.3→6.3 ms/mmHg and -54°→-59°. The values found by xBRS are intermediate between wBRS-resp and wBRS-0.1 Hz. The Appendix shows that for the simulated data the BRS and phase values as found by the wavelet technique can be explained from vector additions of vagal and sympathetic BRS contributions. DISCUSSION: During supine rest parasympathetic control of heart rate dominates BRS; after HUT this is diminished and less effective. Due to the reaction times of the autonomic effectors, the phase relations between the signals depend on the relative contribution of the sympathetics, which explains the larger phase shift.
conclusionCross wavelet analysis allows to follow fast BRS changes in time and frequency, while the computed phase relations help understand sympathetic participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.