Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337927›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2019

Coupled Active Shape Models for Automated Segmentation and Landmark Localization in High-Resolution CT of the Foot and Ankle.

M Brehler, A Islam, L Vogelsang, D Yang, W Sehnert, D Shakoor, S Demehri, J H Siewerdsen, W Zbijewski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Atlas-based algorithm for automatic anatomical measurements in the knee.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M BrehlerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA.
A IslamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA.
L VogelsangCarestream Health, Rochester, NY USA.
D YangCarestream Health, Rochester, NY USA.
W SehnertCarestream Health, Rochester, NY USA.
D ShakoorDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA.
S DemehriDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA.
J H SiewerdsenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA.
W ZbijewskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USCarestream (United States) · US

Funding

Quantitative high resolution cone beam CT for assessment of bone and joint healthR01EB018896 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZBIJEWSKI, WOJCIECH BARTOSZ · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe develop an Active Shape Model (ASM) framework for automated bone segmentation and anatomical landmark localization in weight-bearing Cone-Beam CT (CBCT). To achieve a robust shape model fit in narrow joint spaces of the foot (0.5 - 1 mm), a new approach for incorporating proximity constraints in ASM (coupled ASM, cASM) is proposed.

methodsIn cASM, shape models of multiple adjacent foot bones are jointly fit to the CBCT volume. This coupling enables checking for proximity between the evolving shapes to avoid situations where a conventional single-bone ASM might erroneously fit to articular surfaces of neighbouring bones. We used 21 extremity CBCT scans of the weight-bearing foot to compare segmentation and landmark localization accuracy of ASM and cASM in leave-one-out validation. Each scan was used as a test image once; shape models of calcaneus, talus, navicular, and cuboid were built from manual surface segmentations of the remaining 20 scans. The models were augmented with seven anatomical landmarks used for common measurements of foot alignment. The landmarks were identified in the original CBCT volumes and mapped onto mean bone shape surfaces. ASM and cASM were run for 100 iterations, and the number of principal shape components was increased every 10 iterations. Automated landmark localization was achieved by applying known point correspondences between landmark vertices on the mean shape and vertices of the final active shape segmentation of the test image.

resultsRoot Mean Squared (RMS) error of bone surface segmentation improved from 3.6 mm with conventional ASM to 2.7 mm with cASM. Furthermore, cASM achieved convergence (no change in RMS error with iteration) after ~40 iterations of shape fitting, compared to ~60 iterations for ASM. Distance error in landmark localization was 25% to 55% lower (depending on the landmark) with cASM than with ASM. The importance of using a coupled model is underscored by the finding that cASM detected and corrected collisions between evolving shapes in 50% to 80% (depending on the bone) of shape model fits.

conclusionThe proposed cASM framework improves accuracy of shape model fits, especially in complexes of tightly interlocking, articulated joints. The approach enables automated anatomical analysis in volumetric imaging of the foot and ankle, where narrow joint spaces challenge conventional shape models.

Indexed as

active shape modelsbone segmentationCone-beam CTlandmark identificationweight-bearing CT

Identifiers

PMID31337927
PMCPMC6647836
OpenAlexW2920873246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.