Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337891›Full record

ReviewNature microbiology2019

Modelling approaches for studying the microbiome.

Manish Kumar, Boyang Ji, Karsten Zengler, Jens Nielsen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. SIMBA-GNN: mechanistic graph learning for microbiome prediction.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Toward the Next Generation of In Silico Modeling of Dynamic Host-Microbiota Interactions in the Skin.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manish KumarDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Boyang JiDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karsten ZenglerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8062-3296
Jens NielsenDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. nielsenj@chalmers.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-6003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in metagenome sequencing of the human microbiome have provided a plethora of new insights and revealed a close association of this complex ecosystem with a range of human diseases. However, there is little knowledge about how the different members of the microbial community interact with each other and with the host, and we lack basic mechanistic understanding of these interactions related to health and disease. Mathematical modelling has been demonstrated to be highly advantageous for gaining insights into the dynamics and interactions of complex systems and in recent years, several modelling approaches have been proposed to enhance our understanding of the microbiome. Here, we review the latest developments and current approaches, and highlight how different modelling strategies have been applied to unravel the highly dynamic nature of the human microbiome. Furthermore, we discuss present limitations of different modelling strategies and provide a perspective of how modelling can advance understanding and offer new treatment routes to impact human health.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaModels, TheoreticalBacteriaDiseaseHealthHumansMetabolomicsMetagenomeMicrobial InteractionsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.