Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337815›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Honeycomb-shaped electro-neural interface enables cellular-scale pixels in subretinal prosthesis.

Thomas Flores, Tiffany Huang, Mohajeet Bhuckory, Elton Ho, Zhijie Chen, Roopa Dalal, Ludwig Galambos, Theodore Kamins, Keith Mathieson, Daniel Palanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cellular migration into a subretinal honeycomb-shaped prosthesis for high-resolution prosthetic vision.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Electronic Retinal Prostheses.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas FloresDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. tomflo@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6753-3942
Tiffany HuangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Mohajeet BhuckoryHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Elton HoHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4645-6156
Zhijie ChenHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2705-065X
Roopa DalalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ludwig GalambosDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Theodore KaminsHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-1161
Keith MathiesonInstitute of Photonics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-8076
Daniel PalankerHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

High Resolution Photovoltaic Retinal ProsthesisR01EY018608 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2009 to 2016
$9.2M
Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Photovoltaic Subretinal Prosthesis with High Pixel DensityR01EY027786 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018608NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution visual prostheses require small, densely packed pixels, but limited penetration depth of the electric field formed by a planar electrode array constrains such miniaturization. We present a novel honeycomb configuration of an electrode array with vertically separated active and return electrodes designed to leverage migration of retinal cells into voids in the subretinal space. Insulating walls surrounding each pixel decouple the field penetration depth from the pixel width by aligning the electric field vertically, enabling a decrease of the pixel size down to cellular dimensions. We demonstrate that inner retinal cells migrate into the 25 μm deep honeycomb wells as narrow as 18 μm, resulting in more than half of these cells residing within the electrode cavities. Immune response to honeycombs is comparable to that with planar arrays. Modeled stimulation threshold current density with honeycombs does not increase substantially with reduced pixel size, unlike quadratic increase with planar arrays. This 3-D electrode configuration may enable functional restoration of central vision with acuity better than 20/100 for millions of patients suffering from age-related macular degeneration.

Indexed as

Prosthesis DesignVisual ProsthesisAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElectrodes, ImplantedNeuronsProsthesis ImplantationRatsRetinaRetinal Degeneration

Identifiers

PMID31337815
PMCPMC6650428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.