ArticleScientific reports2019
In Silico Characterization of the Binding Modes of Surfactants with Bovine Serum Albumin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative unfolding of the Trp-cage miniprotein in anionic and cationic surfactants.PloS one · 2026Article
- Surfactant-driven modulation of protein corona on solid lipid nanoparticles: Insights including molecular docking studies.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Computational analysis of antimicrobial peptides targeting key receptors in infection-related cardiovascular diseases: molecular docking and dynamics insights.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- QSAR, molecular docking, and pharmacokinetic analysis of thiosemicarbazone-indole compounds targeting prostate cancer cells.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- Bovine Serum Albumin Bends Over Backward to Interact with Aged Plastics: A Model for Understanding Protein Attachment to Plastic Debris.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Aurone-derived 1,2,3-triazoles as potential fluorescence moleculesRSC advances · 2022Article
- Fluorescent Phthalocyanine-Encapsulated Bovine Serum Albumin Nanoparticles: Their Deployment as Therapeutic Agents in the NIR Region.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Topological Encoded Vector Beams for Monitoring Amyloid-Lipid Interactions in Microcavity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Article
- An integrative toolbox to unlock the structure and dynamics of protein-surfactant complexes.Nanoscale advances · 2020Article
- Cationic Surfactants: Self-Assembly, Structure-Activity Correlation and Their Biological Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The binding interactions of the surfactants: anionic sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), cationic cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), non-ionic octyl glucoside (OG), and zwitterionic 3-[Hexadecyl(dimethyl)ammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (HPS), with bovine serum albumin (BSA) were investigated by computer simulation. The results disclosed that the surfactants bound stably between hydrophobic subdomain IIA and IIIA where tryptophan-213 residue, an important intrinsic fluorophore in BSA is housed. The interactions of the surfactants with the BSA were electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. The head-groups of SDS, HPS and OG formed hydrogen bonds with the BSA, while that of CTAB was shielded from intermolecular hydrogen-bonding due to intervening methyl groups. Subsequently, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of the protein-surfactant complexes revealed that hydrogen bonds formed by OG were stronger than those of SDS and HPS. However, the decomposed force-field energies showed that OG had the least interaction energy with the BSA. In addition to MD simulation, it was found by density functional theory (DFT) that the differences in the coulomb interaction energies can be attributed to charge distribution in the surfactants. Overall, free energies calculated by linear interaction energy (LIE) proved that the binding of each surfactant was dominated by differences between van der Waals interactions in bound and free states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.