ArticleScientific reports2019
Non-invasive evaluation of renal structure and function of healthy individuals with multiparametric MRI: Effects of sex and age.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxygenaging: A Physiological Framework for Geroscience.Aging cell · 2026Review
- Apparent diffusion coefficient of kidneys with non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for functional and anatomical assessment in renal artery stenosis.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Review
- Influence of Field Strength, Sex, and Age on Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling and TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Analysis of cell turnover in the macula densa through the normal aging process.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Renal MRI: From Nephron to NMR Signal.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
- Does diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging help in the detection of renal parenchymal disease and staging/prognostication in chronic kidney disease?Polish journal of radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinically, when applying multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in renal diseases, assessment of renal structure and function has to account for age- and sex-related effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of age and sex on multiparametric MRI assessment of renal structure and function in healthy human beings. Studies on 33 healthy volunteers were performed using multiparametric MRI on a 3.0-Tesla MR scanner, including T1-weighted imaging, blood oxygen level-dependent MRI (BOLD MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Our results revealed that the mean renal cortical thickness (RCT), ratio of cortex to parenchyma (CPR), and cortical R2* values were higher in males than in females. The cortical R2* value was higher in older group than in younger group (18.57 ± 0.99 vs 17.53 ± 0.58, p = 0.001); there was no significant difference in medullary R2* between the older and younger groups (38.18 ± 2.96 vs 36.45 ± 2.47, p = 0.077). The parenchymal thickness (PT) and medullary fractional anisotropy (FA) were lower in older group than in younger group (1.547 ± 0.06 vs 1.604 ± 0.05, p = 0.005 and 0.343 ± 0.03 vs 0.371 ± 0.03, p = 0.016, respectively). Pearson's correlation analysis showed that PT and medullary FA were inversely related with age (r = -0.483, p = 0.004; r = -0.446, p = 0.009) while cortical R2* values was positively related (r = 0.511, p = 0.002, respectively). The medullary apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value had a significant association with PT (r = 0.359, p = 0.04). This study indicated that multiparametric renal MRI parameters are age and sex dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.