Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337749›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Cryptic pocket formation underlies allosteric modulator selectivity at muscarinic GPCRs.

Scott A Hollingsworth, Brendan Kelly, Celine Valant, Jordan Arthur Michaelis, Olivia Mastromihalis, Geoff Thompson, A J Venkatakrishnan, Samuel Hertig, Peter J Scammells, Patrick M Sexton and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Entropy drives the ligand recognition in G-protein-coupled receptor subtypes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Accelerating Cryptic Pocket Discovery Using AlphaFold.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott A HollingsworthDepartments of Computer Science, Molecular and Cellular Physiology, and Structural Biology, and Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3294-0083
Brendan KellyDepartments of Computer Science, Molecular and Cellular Physiology, and Structural Biology, and Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. kellybj86@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-0213
Celine ValantDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Jordan Arthur MichaelisDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Olivia MastromihalisDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Geoff ThompsonDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
A J VenkatakrishnanDepartments of Computer Science, Molecular and Cellular Physiology, and Structural Biology, and Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Samuel HertigDepartments of Computer Science, Molecular and Cellular Physiology, and Structural Biology, and Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Peter J ScammellsDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Patrick M SextonDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-2473
Christian C FelderEli Lilly and Co., Neuroscience, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
Arthur ChristopoulosDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. arthur.christopoulos@monash.edu.
Ron O DrorDepartments of Computer Science, Molecular and Cellular Physiology, and Structural Biology, and Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. ron.dror@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6418-2793
Monash University · AUStanford University · USDiscovery Institute · USEli Lilly (United States) · USInstitute of Mathematical Statistics · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Discovering the mechanism of GPCR-mediated arrestin stimulation to enable effective drug therapiesR01GM127359 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DROR, RON · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127359NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allosteric modulators are highly desirable as drugs, particularly for G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) targets, because allosteric drugs can achieve selectivity between closely related receptors. The mechanisms by which allosteric modulators achieve selectivity remain elusive, however, particularly given recent structures that reveal similar allosteric binding sites across receptors. Here we show that positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) achieve exquisite selectivity by occupying a dynamic pocket absent in existing crystal structures. This cryptic pocket forms far more frequently in molecular dynamics simulations of the M1 mAChR than in those of other mAChRs. These observations reconcile mutagenesis data that previously appeared contradictory. Further mutagenesis experiments validate our prediction that preventing cryptic pocket opening decreases the affinity of M1-selective PAMs. Our findings suggest opportunities for the design of subtype-specific drugs exploiting cryptic pockets that open in certain receptors but not in other receptors with nearly identical static structures.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAllosteric SiteCrystallography, X-RayDrug DesignLigandsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutagenesis, Site-DirectedReceptor, Muscarinic M1Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledLigandsReceptor, Muscarinic M1Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID31337749
PMCPMC6650467
OpenAlexW2962701388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.