Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337701›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2019

Wheat

Chengxia Li, Huiqiong Lin, Andrew Chen, Meiyee Lau, Judy Jernstedt, Jorge Dubcovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular mapping of a novel non-canonical gibberellin-sensitive dwarfing gene Rht29 in wheat (Triticum aestivum).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Regulation of spikelet number during wheat spike development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chengxia LiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Huiqiong LinDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Andrew ChenDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Meiyee LauDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Judy JernstedtDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Jorge DubcovskyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA jdubcovsky@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7571-4345

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spikelet is the basic unit of the grass inflorescence. In this study, we show that wheat MADS-box genes

Indexed as

FlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantInflorescenceMADS Domain ProteinsMeristemPlant ProteinsRepressor ProteinsTriticumMADS Domain ProteinsPlant ProteinsRepressor ProteinsMADS-boxMeristem identitySpike developmentSpikeletWheat

Identifiers

PMID31337701
PMCPMC6679363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.