Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337643›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2019

Phase I and Pharmacology Study of Ropidoxuridine (IPdR) as Prodrug for Iododeoxyuridine-Mediated Tumor Radiosensitization in Advanced GI Cancer Undergoing Radiation.

Timothy Kinsella, Howard Safran, Susan Wiersma, Thomas DiPetrillo, Andrew Schumacher, Kayla Rosati, John Vatkevich, Lawrence W Anderson, Kimberly D Hill, Charles Kunos and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy KinsellaBrown University Oncology Group (BrUOG), Providence, Rhode Island. tkinsella@lifespan.org.
Howard SafranBrown University Oncology Group (BrUOG), Providence, Rhode Island.
Susan WiersmaEMEK, Inc., Warwick, Rhode Island.
Thomas DiPetrilloBrown University Oncology Group (BrUOG), Providence, Rhode Island.
Andrew SchumacherLifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island.
Kayla RosatiBrown University Oncology Group (BrUOG), Providence, Rhode Island.
John VatkevichLifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island.
Lawrence W AndersonDevelopmental Therapeutics Program (DTP), NCI, Bethesda, Maryland.
Kimberly D HillLeidos Biomedical Research Inc, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Charles KunosCancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), NCI, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jerry M CollinsDevelopmental Therapeutics Program (DTP), NCI, Bethesda, Maryland.
Brown University · USLifespan · USNeuroDevelopment Center · USCommunity College of Rhode Island · USLeidos (United States) · USTracer Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS HHSN261201400013C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIododeoxyuridine (IUdR) is a potent radiosensitizer; however, its clinical utility is limited by dose-limiting systemic toxicities and the need for prolonged continuous infusion. 5-Iodo-2-pyrimidinone-2'-deoxyribose (IPdR) is an oral prodrug of IUdR that, compared with IUdR, is easier to administer and less toxic, with a more favorable therapeutic index in preclinical studies. Here, we report the clinical and pharmacologic results of a first-in-human phase I dose escalation study of IPdR + concurrent radiation therapy (RT) in patients with advanced metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. PATIENTS AND

methodsAdult patients with metastatic GI cancers referred for palliative RT to the chest, abdomen, or pelvis were eligible for study. Patients received IPdR orally once every day × 28 days beginning 7 days before the initiation of RT (37.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy × 15 fractions). A 2-part dose escalation scheme was used, pharmacokinetic studies were performed at multiple time points, and all patients were assessed for toxicity and response to Day 56.

resultsNineteen patients were entered on study. Dose-limiting toxicity was encountered at 1,800 mg every day, and the recommended phase II dose is 1,200 mg every day. Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated achievable and sustainable levels of plasma IUdR ≥1 μmol/L (levels previously shown to mediate radiosensitization). Two complete, 3 partial, and 9 stable responses were achieved in target lesions.

conclusionsAdministration of IPdR orally every day × 28 days with RT is feasible and tolerable at doses that produce plasma IUdR levels ≥1 μmol/L. These results support the investigation of IPdR + RT in phase II studies.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyDose Fractionation, RadiationFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansIdoxuridineMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProdrugsIdoxuridineProdrugsPyrimidine NucleosidesRadiation-Sensitizing Agentsropidoxuridine

Identifiers

PMID31337643
PMCPMC6801071
OpenAlexW2962901009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.