Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337640›Full record

SynthesisCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2019

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Associations between Clinical Prostatitis and Prostate Cancer: New Estimates Accounting for Detection Bias.

Marvin E Langston, Mara Horn, Saira Khan, Ratna Pakpahan, Michelle Doering, Leslie K Dennis, Siobhan Sutcliffe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Why Do Epidemiologic Studies Find an Inverse Association Between Intraprostatic Inflammation and Prostate Cancer: A Possible Role for Colliding Bias?Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marvin E LangstonDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. langstonm@wustl.edu.
Mara HornDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Saira KhanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Ratna PakpahanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Michelle DoeringBecker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Leslie K DennisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Siobhan SutcliffeDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA190194 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRAHAM A. COLDITZ, AIMEE S JAMES · 2014 to 2026
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA190194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious meta-analyses have estimated summary positive associations between clinical prostatitis and prostate cancer. However, none have accounted for detection bias, the possibility for increased prostate cancer screening and detection in men with clinical prostatitis, in their pooled estimates.

methodsWe searched for studies that investigated the relation between clinical prostatitis and prostate cancer through November 2018. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate summary odds ratios (OR) among all studies and in strata defined by methods used to reduce detection bias.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that previously reported positive associations between clinical prostatitis and prostate cancer are likely due to detection bias. IMPACT: Studies using rigorous detection bias methods are warranted to replicate these findings, as well as to examine the possible relation between prostate inflammation and prostate cancer directly, rather than indirectly through the diagnosis of "prostatitis," which includes a large proportion of men without evidence of prostate inflammation.

Indexed as

BiasEarly Detection of CancerHumansKallikreinsMaleModels, StatisticalProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsProstatitisKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID31337640
PMCPMC6774844
OpenAlexW2964229726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.