Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337437›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial: does an SMS behaviour change programme with a classroom-based session improve the oral health of young people living in deprived areas? A study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Zoe Marshman, Hannah Ainsworth, Ivor Gordon Chestnutt, Peter Day, Donna Dey, Sarab El Yousfi, Caroline Fairhurst, Fiona Gilchrist, Catherine Hewitt, Claire Jones and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zoe MarshmanSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.
Hannah AinsworthYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Ivor Gordon ChestnuttCardiff University School of Dentistry, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XY, UK.
Peter DaySchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK.
Donna DeySchool of Education and Social Work, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK.
Sarab El YousfiSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.
Caroline FairhurstYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Fiona GilchristSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.
Catherine HewittYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Claire JonesHealth information Centre, University of Dundee, (Main Level 5 Corridor), Second Floor (Level 7), Mail Box 15, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Ian KellarSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Lifton Place, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Sue PavittDental Translational & Clinical Research Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK.
Mark RobertsonSchool of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Park Place, Dundee, DD6 8EF, UK. m.r.robertson@dundee.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-3044
Sarwat ShahDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Katherine StevensHealth Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
David TorgersonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences ARRC Building, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Nicola InnesSchool of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Park Place, Dundee, DD6 8EF, UK.
University of York · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

Department of Health 15/166/08Health Technology Assessment Programme 15/166/08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlmost one-half of 12-15 year olds living in deprived areas of the UK have dental caries (tooth decay) with few oral health promotion programmes aimed at children of this age. Mobile phone-based interventions such as short messaging service (SMS) interventions have been found effective at changing certain behaviours and improving health outcomes. This protocol describes the BRIGHT Trial, investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a behaviour change intervention-classroom-based session (CBS) embedded in the curriculum and a series of SMS delivered to participants twice daily to remind them to brush their teeth, compared to usual curriculum and no SMS-to reduce the prevalence of dental caries in young people from deprived areas.

objectivesTo investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to improve the oral health of young people living in deprived areas. METHODS/

designThis is a school-based, assessor-blinded, two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot trial. Overall, the trial will involve approximately 5040 11-13 year olds in 42 schools with a 3-year follow-up. The trial will take place in secondary schools in England, Scotland and Wales. The primary outcome is the presence of carious lesions in permanent teeth at 3 years. Secondary outcomes are: number of carious teeth, frequency of twice-daily toothbrushing, plaque levels, gingivitis, child health-related quality of life and oral health-related quality of life. A cost-utility analysis will be conducted. DISCUSSION: The findings of the trial have implications for embedding oral health interventions into school curricula guidance produced by national bodies, including departments for education and dental public health and guideline-development organisations.

trial registrationISRCTN registry, ISRCTN12139369 . Registered on 10 May 2017.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorChild BehaviorHealth BehaviorOral HygienePoverty AreasSchool DentistryText MessagingAdolescentAge FactorsCell PhoneChildCost-Benefit AnalysisDental CariesFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth Education, DentalBehaviour changeCaries preventionChild dental healthDental cariesmHealthPreventionRandomised controlled trialShort messaging service

Identifiers

PMID31337437
PMCPMC6651965
OpenAlexW2956106763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.