ArticleSystematic reviews2019
A scoping review of mental health prevention and intervention initiatives for infants and preschoolers at risk for socio-emotional difficulties.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Little All Children in Focus (Little ACF) - evaluation of a parenting support programme for parents of children aged 1-2 years in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2026Trial
- Food-Body-Mind study protocol: A mindfulness-based lifestyle intervention to promote whole child health among preschoolers from economically marginalized families.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Dyadic attachment-based therapies for infants and young children with mental health problems: a scoping review.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Review
- Partner-inclusive prenatal intervention to promote parenting readiness: Results from a pilot trial.Infant mental health journal · 2025Article
- Virtual Delivery of Parent Coaching Interventions in Early Childhood Mental Health: A Scoping Review.Child psychiatry and human development · 2025Article
- Delays in treatment initiation for posttraumatic stress disorder in the Canadian Armed Forces: A scoping review.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024Review
- Leveraging the interpersonal context of child development to promote family resilience: A universal prevention approach from preconception through early childhood.Mental health & prevention · 2024Article
- Preschool Programs that Help Families Promote Child Social-Emotional School Readiness: Promising New Strategies.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2023Review
- 10 Year Longitudinal Evaluation of the Spilstead Model of Milieu Intervention.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2023Article
- A scoping review of global vaccine certificate solutions for COVID-19.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Music, families and interaction (MUFASA): a protocol article for an RCT study.BMC psychology · 2022Article
- Exploring Perinatal Indicators of Infant Social-Emotional Development: A Review of the Replicated Evidence.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2021Review
- Predictive Model Construction for Social-Emotional Competence of Toddlers in Shanghai, China: A Population-Based Study.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Prevention of Mental Health Difficulties for Children Aged 0-3 Years: A Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfant mental health has emerged as a unique area of practice and research distinguished from child and youth sub-specialties by its advocacy for a relational practice framework with an emphasis on parents/caregivers being integral to assessment, treatment, and prevention initiatives. A diverse array of initiatives offered across a broad spectrum of delivery methods is available to clinicians. However, to date, a large-scale mapping of the research evidence regarding these interventions has yet to be completed to help inform clinician's decisions regarding the best approaches for their clients. To address this knowledge gap, this study aimed to report on the landscape of research pertaining to mental health interventions for infants and preschoolers (0-5 years), and their families at risk for socio-emotional difficulties and negative developmental outcomes.
methodA scoping review methodology was used to conduct a large-scale mapping of the intervention research pertaining to infants and preschoolers (0-5) at risk for socio-emotional difficulties. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, LILACS, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source, World Cat, and ClinicalTrials.gov , from inception to December 31, 2012. We extracted information regarding publication date, geographical location, study design, level of risk, population, key intervention mechanism, and outcome measures.
resultsWe identified 533 potential studies from 1233 title and abstracts after the first round of screening. Full text article review in the second round of screening resulted in a total of 162 included articles for the final analysis. Results indicated that over 50% of interventions evaluated were randomized controlled trials conducted in Westernized countries. Most studies could be subdivided by level of risk within a preventative public health framework including universal, selected, indicated, and direct treatment for children formally diagnosed with a mental disorder. Risk factors experienced by children and their families were heterogeneously defined and numerous outcome measures across included studies. The results of this study are limited to the last search date of 2012.
conclusionsKey intervention mechanisms spanned a range of approaches including parenting groups, dyadic, in-home, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and day care-based interventions. The findings are discussed in terms of implications for broad trends and gaps in research and policy for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.