Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337341›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium, and population structure analysis of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) from an origin center, Guizhou plateau, using genome-wide SNPs developed by genotyping-by-sequencing.

Suzhen Niu, Qinfei Song, Hisashi Koiwa, Dahe Qiao, Degang Zhao, Zhengwu Chen, Xia Liu, Xiaopeng Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mining ofHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetic Variation in a Crossing Population ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suzhen NiuThe Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Germplasm Innovationin Mountainous Region (Ministry of Education), Institute of Agro-Bioengineering / College of Tea Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Qinfei SongThe Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Germplasm Innovationin Mountainous Region (Ministry of Education), Institute of Agro-Bioengineering / College of Tea Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Hisashi KoiwaVegetable and Fruit Improvement Center, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences Program, MS2133 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2133, USA.
Dahe QiaoInstitute of Tea, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, 550006, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Degang ZhaoThe Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Germplasm Innovationin Mountainous Region (Ministry of Education), Institute of Agro-Bioengineering / College of Tea Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China. dgzhao@gzu.edu.cn.
Zhengwu ChenInstitute of Tea, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, 550006, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China. zwchentea@163.com.
Xia LiuThe Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Germplasm Innovationin Mountainous Region (Ministry of Education), Institute of Agro-Bioengineering / College of Tea Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiaopeng WenInstitute of Agro-bioengineering/College of Life Science, Guizhou University, Huaxi Avenue, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Guizhou Science and Technology Department [2017]2558)Guizhou Science and Technology Department [2017]5788Guizhou Science and Technology Department [2019]1404Guizhou Top Level Innovation Talents Cultivation Project 20164003National Institute of Food and Agriculture USDA-NIFA SCRI grant (2017-51181-26834)National Natural Science Foundation of China 31560222)Talent Base for Germplasm Resources Utilization and Innovation of Characteristic Plant in Guizhou RCJD2018-14the Genetically Breeding Major Project of the Ministry of Agriculture of China 2016ZX08010-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo efficiently protect and exploit germplasm resources for marker development and breeding purposes, we must accurately depict the features of the tea populations. This study focuses on the Camellia sinensis (C. sinensis) population and aims to (i) identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the genome level, (ii) investigate the genetic diversity and population structure, and (iii) characterize the linkage disequilibrium (LD) pattern to facilitate next genome-wide association mapping and marker-assisted selection.

resultsWe collected 415 tea accessions from the Origin Center and analyzed the genetic diversity, population structure and LD pattern using the genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach. A total of 79,016 high-quality SNPs were identified; the polymorphism information content (PIC) and genetic diversity (GD) based on these SNPs showed a higher level of genetic diversity in cultivated type than in wild type. The 415 accessions were clustered into three groups by STRUCTURE software and confirmed using principal component analyses (PCA)-wild type, cultivated type, and admixed wild type. However, unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) trees indicated the accessions should be grouped into more clusters. Further analyses identified four groups, the Pure Wild Type, Admixed Wild Type, ancient landraces and modern landraces using STRUCTURE, and the results were confirmed by PCA and UPGMA tree method. A higher level of genetic diversity was detected in ancient landraces and Admixed Wild Type than that in the Pure Wild Type and modern landraces. The highest differentiation was between the Pure Wild Type and modern landraces. A relatively fast LD decay with a short range (kb) was observed, and the LD decays of four inferred populations were different.

conclusionsThis study is, to our knowledge, the first population genetic analysis of tea germplasm from the Origin Center, Guizhou Plateau, using GBS. The LD pattern, population structure and genetic differentiation of the tea population revealed by our study will benefit further genetic studies, germplasm protection, and breeding.

Indexed as

Camellia sinensisChinaGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotyping TechniquesLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation DynamicsGenetic diversityGenotyping-by-sequencingGuizhou plateauLinkage disequilibriumOrigin centerPopulation structureTea plant

Identifiers

PMID31337341
PMCPMC6652003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.