Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337331›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2019

Rapid identification of inflorescence type markers by genotyping-by-sequencing of diploid and triploid F

Conny Tränkner, Jörg Krüger, Stefan Wanke, Julia Naumann, Torsten Wenke, Frauke Engel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Study on the Flower Induction Mechanism ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome sequence of Hydrangea macrophylla and its application in analysis of the double flower phenotype.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Conny TränknerLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Kühnhäuser Straße 101, 99090, Erfurt, Germany. conny.traenkner@fh-erfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4057-5250
Jörg KrügerLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Kühnhäuser Straße 101, 99090, Erfurt, Germany.
Stefan WankeInstitut für Botanik, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 20b, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Julia NaumannInstitut für Botanik, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 20b, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Torsten WenkeInstitut für Botanik, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 20b, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Frauke EngelGartenbau Kötterheinrich Hortensienkulturen, Hohner Mark 20, 49525, Lengerich, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Erfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ornamental crop Hydrangea macrophylla develops highly attractive lacecap (wild type) or mophead inflorescences. The mophead trait, which is mostly favored by consumers, is recessively inherited by the INFLORESCENCE TYPE locus (INF). If lacecap cultivars are crossed with mophead cultivars, then either 50% or all progenies develop lacecap inflorescences, depending on the zygosity at the INF locus. For most cultivars, the zygosity at the INF locus is unknown. Furthermore, the determination of the inflorescence type in offspring populations is time-consuming, because seedlings flower the first time in the 2nd year after sowing. Within this study, we aimed to develop DNA-based markers that allow to determine the zygosity at the INF locus of prospective parental plants and to predict the inflorescence phenotype of seedlings already in the non-flowering stage.

resultsBy crossing a mophead and a lacecap cultivar of H. macrophylla, we produced a pseudo-backcross F

conclusionThrough bulk sequence analysis of pooled GbS data from diploid and polyploid F

Indexed as

DiploidyGenotypeInflorescenceTriploidyBase SequenceFlowersGenome, PlantHydrangeaPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociBreedingGenotyping-by-sequencingMarker associated selectionOrnamentalPolyploidyUnreduced gametes

Identifiers

PMID31337331
PMCPMC6651981
OpenAlexW2964312404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.