Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337122›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

No Effect of Tart Cherry Juice or Pomegranate Juice on Recovery from Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage in Non-Resistance Trained Men.

Kirstie L Lamb, Mayur K Ranchordas, Elizabeth Johnson, Jessica Denning, Faye Downing, Anthony Lynn

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Eccentric Exercise and Muscle Damage: An Introductory Guide.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirstie L LambFood and Nutrition Group, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.
Mayur K RanchordasAcademy of Sport and Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S10 2BP, UK.
Elizabeth JohnsonDepartment of Oncology, Human Nutrition, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Jessica DenningDepartment of Oncology, Human Nutrition, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Faye DowningFood and Nutrition Group, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.
Anthony LynnFood and Nutrition Group, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK. T.Lynn@shu.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tart cherry juice (TC) and pomegranate juice (POM) have been demonstrated to reduce symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD), but their effectiveness has not been compared. This randomized, double-blind, parallel study compared the effects of TC and POM on markers of EIMD. Thirty-six non-resistance trained men (age 24.0 (Interquartile Range (IQR) 22.0, 33.0) years, body mass index (BMI) 25.6 ± 4.0 kg·m

Indexed as

Fruit and Vegetable JuicesPomegranatePrunus aviumAdultDouble-Blind MethodExerciseHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMyalgiaRecovery of FunctionResistance TrainingYoung Adultexercise-induced muscle damagepolyphenolspomegranaterecoverytart cherry

Identifiers

PMID31337122
PMCPMC6683053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.