Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31337106›Full record

ReviewToxins2019

Aflatoxin Binders in Foods for Human Consumption-Can This be Promoted Safely and Ethically?

Sara Ahlberg, Delia Randolph, Sheila Okoth, Johanna Lindahl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Toxicology reports · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Fungi and Aflatoxin Levels in Traditionally Processed Cassava (International journal of microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Retrospective and Prospective Look at Aflatoxin Research and Development from a Practical Standpoint.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara AhlbergDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. sarahellinahlberg@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5824-5268
Delia RandolphDepartment of Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
Sheila OkothSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 30197, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-7803-0301
Johanna LindahlInternational Livestock Research Institute, 298 Kim Ma Street, Ba Dinh District, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aflatoxins continue to be a food safety problem globally, especially in developing regions. A significant amount of effort and resources have been invested in an attempt to control aflatoxins. However, these efforts have not substantially decreased the prevalence nor the dietary exposure to aflatoxins in developing countries. One approach to aflatoxin control is the use of binding agents in foods, and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been studied extensively for this purpose. However, when assessing the results comprehensively and reviewing the practicality and ethics of use, risks are evident, and concerns arise. In conclusion, our review suggests that there are too many issues with using LAB for aflatoxin binding for it to be safely promoted. Arguably, using binders in human food might even worsen food safety in the longer term.

Indexed as

Food SafetyAflatoxinsDeveloping CountriesFood ContaminationHumansKenyaLactobacillalesAflatoxinsAflatoxinsbindingbiocontrolfood disciplinefood safety

Identifiers

PMID31337106
PMCPMC6669551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.