Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31336997›Full record

Observational studySensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Use of Machine Learning and Wearable Sensors to Predict Energetics and Kinematics of Cutting Maneuvers.

Matteo Zago, Chiarella Sforza, Claudia Dolci, Marco Tarabini, Manuela Galli

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Classifying Elite From Novice Athletes Using Simulated Wearable Sensor Data.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo ZagoDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy. matteo2.zago@polimi.it.
Chiarella SforzaDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-6464
Claudia DolciDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Marco TarabiniE4Sport Lab, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2640-1764
Manuela GalliDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2772-4837
Politecnico di Milano · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Università degli Studi di Milano Piano di sostegno alla ricerca 2015-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes of directions and cutting maneuvers, including 180-degree turns, are common locomotor actions in team sports, implying high mechanical load. While the mechanics and neurophysiology of turns have been extensively studied in laboratory conditions, modern inertial measurement units allow us to monitor athletes directly on the field. In this study, we applied four supervised machine learning techniques (linear regression, support vector regression/machine, boosted decision trees and artificial neural networks) to predict turn direction, speed (before/after turn) and the related positive/negative mechanical work. Reference values were computed using an optical motion capture system. We collected data from 13 elite female soccer players performing a shuttle run test, wearing a six-axes inertial sensor at the pelvis level. A set of 18 features (predictors) were obtained from accelerometers, gyroscopes and barometer readings. Turn direction classification returned good results (accuracy > 98.4%) with all methods. Support vector regression and neural networks obtained the best performance in the estimation of positive/negative mechanical work (coefficient of determination R

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaMachine LearningWearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleHumansRunningSoccerYoung Adultchanges of directionIMUmechanical worksupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID31336997
PMCPMC6679305
OpenAlexW2958112481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.