Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31336897›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Consumer Understanding and Culinary Use of Legumes in Australia.

Natalie Figueira, Felicity Curtain, Eleanor Beck, Sara Grafenauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Feasibility of a co-designed and personalised intervention to improve vegetable intake in rural-dwelling young adults.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Valorisation of the HalophyteFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Perceptions, Knowledge and Culinary Use of Legumes in Australia: A Convenience Sample Analysis.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalie FigueiraSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong 2522, Australia.
Felicity CurtainGrains & Legumes Nutrition Council, Mount Street, North Sydney 2060, Australia.
Eleanor BeckSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong 2522, Australia.
Sara GrafenauerSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong 2522, Australia. sarag@glnc.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While health benefits of legume consumption are well documented, intake is well below recommendations in many Western cultures, and little is known regarding culinary use and consumer understanding of these foods. This study aimed to investigate consumption, knowledge, attitudes, and culinary use of legumes in a convenience sample of Australians. An online computer-based survey was used to gather data and demographic characteristics. Respondents (505 individuals answered in full or in part) were regular consumers of legumes (177/376 consumed legumes 2-4 times weekly). Chickpeas, green peas, and kidney beans were most often consumed, and were made into most commonly Mexican, then Indian and Middle Eastern meals. Consumers correctly identified protein and dietary fibre (37%) as key nutritional attributes. For non-consumers (7%; 34/463), taste, a lack of knowledge of how to prepare and include legumes, and the time taken to prepare, along with family preferences, hindered consumption. Participants identified the food category as "beans" rather than "legumes", and this may have implications for dietary guidance at an individual and policy level. Addressing barriers to consumption, perhaps through food innovation, emphasizing positive health attributes, and clarification within dietary guidelines, are important considerations for increasing consumption of legumes.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorCookingFabaceaeNutritive ValueAustraliaData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesbeanconsumptionculinary usedietary fibredietary guidelinesfood classificationlegumeproteinveganvegetarian

Identifiers

PMID31336897
PMCPMC6682881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.