Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31336890›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Genetically Engineered-MSC Therapies for Non-unions, Delayed Unions and Critical-size Bone Defects.

Jaime Freitas, Susana Gomes Santos, Raquel Madeira Gonçalves, José Henrique Teixeira, Mário Adolfo Barbosa, Maria Inês Almeida

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Human T-Cell Responses to Metallic Ion-Doped Bioactive Glasses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Circular RNAs: Promising Targets in Osteoporosis.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Long non-coding RNA CASC2 regulates osteoblasts matrix mineralization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaime Freitasi3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3229-3293
Susana Gomes Santosi3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8604-2978
Raquel Madeira Gonçalvesi3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
José Henrique Teixeirai3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Mário Adolfo Barbosai3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Maria Inês Almeidai3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. ines.almeida@ineb.up.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-2072-8587

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The normal bone regeneration process is a complex and coordinated series of events involving different cell types and molecules. However, this process is impaired in critical-size/large bone defects, with non-unions or delayed unions remaining a major clinical problem. Novel strategies are needed to aid the current therapeutic approaches. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are able to promote bone regeneration. Their beneficial effects can be improved by modulating the expression levels of specific genes with the purpose of stimulating MSC proliferation, osteogenic differentiation or their immunomodulatory capacity. In this context, the genetic engineering of MSCs is expected to further enhance their pro-regenerative properties and accelerate bone healing. Herein, we review the most promising molecular candidates (protein-coding and non-coding transcripts) and discuss the different methodologies to engineer and deliver MSCs, mainly focusing on in vivo animal studies. Considering the potential of the MSC secretome for bone repair, this topic has also been addressed. Furthermore, the promising results of clinical studies using MSC for bone regeneration are discussed. Finally, we debate the advantages and limitations of using MSCs, or genetically-engineered MSCs, and their potential as promoters of bone fracture regeneration/repair.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationFracture HealingGenetic EngineeringMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsBiomarkersCell DifferentiationClinical Studies as TopicDisease Models, AnimalFractures, BoneHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersbone repairimmunomodulationosteogenic differentiationregeneration

Identifiers

PMID31336890
PMCPMC6678255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.