Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31336859›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Work-Up, Staging, and Local Intervention Strategies.

Eran van Veldhuisen, Claudia van den Oord, Lilly J Brada, Marieke S Walma, Jantien A Vogel, Johanna W Wilmink, Marco Del Chiaro, Krijn P van Lienden, Martijn R Meijerink, Geertjan van Tienhoven and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Enhancing management of pancreatic cancer: impact of a same day multidisciplinary clinic on access to guideline-directed care.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cancers · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Eran van VeldhuisenDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5664-2286
Claudia van den OordDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lilly J BradaDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marieke S WalmaDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jantien A VogelDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johanna W WilminkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco Del ChiaroDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80045, USA.
Krijn P van LiendenDepartment of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn R MeijerinkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1500-7294
Geertjan van TienhovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thilo HackertDepartment of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Christopher L WolfgangDepartment of Surgery, John's Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Hjalmar van SantvoortDepartments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Olivier R BuschDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I Quintus MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Casper H van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.g.besselink@amsterdamumc.nl.
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group and International Collaborative Group on Locally Advanced Pancreatic CancerDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUtrecht University · NLErasmus MC · NLHeidelberg University · DEJohns Hopkins Hospital · USSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 2014-7244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has several definitions but essentially is a nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer, in which upfront resection is considered not beneficial due to extensive vascular involvement and consequent high chance of a nonradical resection. The introduction of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (gem-nab) has had major implications for the management and outcome of patients with LAPC. After 4-6 months induction chemotherapy, the majority of patients have stable disease or even tumor-regression. Of these, 12 to 35% are successfully downstaged to resectable disease. Several studies have reported a 30-35 months overall survival after resection; although it currently remains unclear if this is a result of the resection or the good response to chemotherapy. Following chemotherapy, selection of patients for resection is difficult, as contrast-enhanced computed-tomography (CT) scan is unreliable in differentiating between viable tumor and fibrosis. In case a resection is not considered possible but stable disease is observed, local ablative techniques are being studied, such as irreversible electroporation, radiofrequency ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Pragmatic, multicenter, randomized studies will ultimately have to confirm the exact role of both surgical exploration and ablation in these patients. Since evidence-based guidelines for the management of LAPC are lacking, this review proposes a standardized approach for the treatment of LAPC based on the best available evidence.

Indexed as

ablationexplorative laparotomyFOLFIRINOXlocally advanced pancreatic cancerresection

Identifiers

PMID31336859
PMCPMC6679311
OpenAlexW2960253622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.