Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31336836›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Operationalizing the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations: A Standardized Scoring System.

Marissa M Shams-White, Nigel T Brockton, Panagiota Mitrou, Dora Romaguera, Susannah Brown, Alice Bender, Lisa L Kahle, Jill Reedy

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 181 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06802406 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Nutrition OUtReach In Systems of Healthcare

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2025 to 2029Enrolled210ConditionsALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION, Autologous Haemopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, CAR-T Cell Therapy, Food InsecurityArmsFood Bags
NCT07722442 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility, Acceptability and Preliminary Efficacy of a Personalised Behavioural Intervention to Improve Adherence to Dietary and Lifestyle Cancer Prevention Recommendations in Adults Attending Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Programmes: A Three-Arm Randomised Pilot Trial (CANVIA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundació d'investigació Sanitària de les Illes BalearsRan2026 to 2028Enrolled162ConditionsDietary and Lifestyle Behaviour ChangeArmsPersonalised baseline feedback report, CANVIA mobile app intervention, Additional health professional support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Combined lifestyle factors on mortality and cardiovascular disease among cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Effects of a Physical Activity mHealth Intervention (Fit2Thrive) on WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Impact of lung cancer diagnosis on patient lifestyle and physical activity.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marissa M Shams-WhiteRisk Factor Assessment Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. marissa.shams-white@nih.gov.
Nigel T BrocktonAmerican Institute for Cancer Research, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.
Panagiota MitrouWorld Cancer Research Fund International, 22 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3HH, UK.
Dora RomagueraBalearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), University Hospital Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Susannah BrownWorld Cancer Research Fund International, 22 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3HH, UK.
Alice BenderAmerican Institute for Cancer Research, Arlington, VA 22209, USA.
Lisa L KahleInformation Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Jill ReedyRisk Factor Assessment Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the publication of the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) Third Expert Report, a collaborative group was formed to develop a standardized scoring system and provide guidance for research applications.

methodsThe 2018 WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations, goals, and statements of advice were examined to define components of the new Score. Cut-points for scoring were based on quantitative guidance in the 2018 Recommendations and other guidelines, past research that operationalized 2007 WCRF/AICR Recommendations, and advice from the Continuous Update Project Expert Panel.

resultsEight of the ten 2018 WCRF/AICR Recommendations concerning weight, physical activity, diet, and breastfeeding (optional), were selected for inclusion. Each component is worth one point: 1, 0.5, and 0 points for fully, partially, and not meeting each recommendation, respectively (Score: 0 to 7-8 points). Two recommendations on dietary supplement use and for cancer survivors are not included due to operational redundancy. Additional guidance stresses the importance of accounting for other risk factors (e.g., smoking) in relevant models.

conclusionsThe proposed 2018 WCRF/AICR Score is a practical tool for researchers to examine how adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR Recommendations relates to cancer risk and mortality in various adult populations.

Indexed as

Global HealthPractice Guidelines as TopicAcademies and InstitutesBody WeightDietExerciseFemaleFoodHumansMaleNeoplasmsResearch DesignUnited Statesbreastfeedingcancer preventiondietdietary guidelinesindex scorephysical activityweight

Identifiers

PMID31336836
PMCPMC6682977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.