ArticleBiosensors2019
Design and Evaluation of a Non-ContactBed-Mounted Sensing Device for AutomatedIn-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea:A Pilot Study.
Article in Biosensors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of Novel Digital Clinical Tools in the Screening or Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic Modalities in Sleep Disordered Breathing: Current and Emerging Technology and Its Potential to Transform Diagnostics.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Diagnosis and Screening Through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- What radio waves tell us about sleep!Sleep · 2025Article
- [Sleep Innovation].Open respiratory archives · 2024Review
- Predictive Data Analytics in Telecare and Telehealth: Systematic Scoping Review.Online journal of public health informatics · 2024Article
- Associations between obstructive sleep apnea risk and urinary incontinence: Insights from a nationally representative survey.PloS one · 2024Article
- A Minimum Set of Physiological Parameters to Diagnose Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Using Non-Invasive Portable Monitors. A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Recognition of Patient Groups with Sleep Related Disorders using Bio-signal Processing and Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of a custom built non-contactpressure-sensitive device in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity as an alternative toin-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) and a Type 3 in-home sleep apnea test (HSAT). Fourteenpatients completed PSG sleep studies for one night with simultaneous recording from ourload-cell-based sensing device in the bed. Subjects subsequently installed pressure sensors in theirbed at home and recorded signals for up to four nights. Machine learning models were optimized toclassify sleep apnea severity using a standardized American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)scoring of the gold standard studies as reference. On a per-night basis, our model reached a correctOSA detection rate of 82.9% (sensitivity = 88.9%, specificity = 76.5%), and OSA severity classificationaccuracy of 74.3% (61.5% and 81.8% correctly classified in-clinic and in-home tests, respectively).There was no difference in Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) estimation when subjects wore HSATsensors versus load cells (LCs) only (p-value = 0.62). Our in-home diagnostic system providesan unobtrusive method for detecting OSA with high sensitivity and may potentially be used forlong-term monitoring of breathing during sleep. Further research is needed to address the lowerspecificity resulting from using the highest AHI from repeated samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.