Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31336678›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2019

Design and Evaluation of a Non-ContactBed-Mounted Sensing Device for AutomatedIn-Home Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea:A Pilot Study.

Clara Mosquera-Lopez, Joseph Leitschuh, John Condon, Chad C Hagen, Uma Rajhbeharrysingh, Cody Hanks, Peter G Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Sleep Innovation].Open respiratory archives · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clara Mosquera-LopezArtificial Intelligence for Medical Systems (AIMS) Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, OregonHealth and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. mosquera@ohsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1586-2490
Joseph LeitschuhArtificial Intelligence for Medical Systems (AIMS) Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, OregonHealth and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. leitschj@ohsu.edu.
John CondonProto-tech Research, Portland, OR 97267, USA. jcondon11@yahoo.com.
Chad C HagenArtificial Intelligence for Medical Systems (AIMS) Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, OregonHealth and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. chagenmd@gmail.com.
Uma RajhbeharrysinghArtificial Intelligence for Medical Systems (AIMS) Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, OregonHealth and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. rsingh.uma@gmail.com.
Cody HanksDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA. cody.hanks2@gmail.com.
Peter G JacobsArtificial Intelligence for Medical Systems (AIMS) Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, OregonHealth and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. jacobsp@ohsu.edu.

Funding

Unobtrusive measurement of sleep disordered breathing in the homeR01HL098621 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HAGEN, CHAD CAMERON, JACOBS, PETER G · 2010 to 2016
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098621NIH HHS NIH/NIHLB 2R01HL098621-04A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of a custom built non-contactpressure-sensitive device in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity as an alternative toin-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) and a Type 3 in-home sleep apnea test (HSAT). Fourteenpatients completed PSG sleep studies for one night with simultaneous recording from ourload-cell-based sensing device in the bed. Subjects subsequently installed pressure sensors in theirbed at home and recorded signals for up to four nights. Machine learning models were optimized toclassify sleep apnea severity using a standardized American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)scoring of the gold standard studies as reference. On a per-night basis, our model reached a correctOSA detection rate of 82.9% (sensitivity = 88.9%, specificity = 76.5%), and OSA severity classificationaccuracy of 74.3% (61.5% and 81.8% correctly classified in-clinic and in-home tests, respectively).There was no difference in Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) estimation when subjects wore HSATsensors versus load cells (LCs) only (p-value = 0.62). Our in-home diagnostic system providesan unobtrusive method for detecting OSA with high sensitivity and may potentially be used forlong-term monitoring of breathing during sleep. Further research is needed to address the lowerspecificity resulting from using the highest AHI from repeated samples.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesHome Care ServicesAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAutomationData AnalysisFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatorySleep Apnea, ObstructiveApnea-Hypopnea Indexautomated obstructive sleep apnea diagnosiscontact-less load cell sensorlong-term breathing monitoringunobtrusive obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID31336678
PMCPMC6784712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.