Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31336264›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2019

Age differences in electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) usage motivations and behaviors, perceived health benefit, and intention to quit.

Thanh-Huyen T Vu, Joy L Hart, Allison Groom, Robyn L Landry, Kandi L Walker, Aida L Giachello, Lindsay Tompkins, Jennie Z Ma, Anshula Kesh, Rose Marie Robertson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Barriers to quittingPreventive medicine reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Motives of Tobacco Use Among Young Adults in the United States Air Force.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thanh-Huyen T VuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: huyenvu@northwestern.edu.
Joy L HartAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Allison GroomAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA; American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, Dallas, TX, USA.
Robyn L LandryAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA; American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, Dallas, TX, USA.
Kandi L WalkerAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Aida L GiachelloDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA.
Lindsay TompkinsAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Jennie Z MaAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Anshula KeshAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA; American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, Dallas, TX, USA.
Rose Marie RobertsonAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA; American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, Dallas, TX, USA.
Thomas J PayneAmerican Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center (A-TRAC), Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Otolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

Funding

Research Training and Education Core (Core D) P50HL120163 · NHLBI · AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION · PI BHATNAGAR, ARUNI, ROBERTSON, ROSE MARIE · 2013 to 2017
$20.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL120163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionData from comprehensive studies are sparse regarding age differences in issues related to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) usage. This study examined age differences in usage motivations and behaviors, perceived health benefit, and quit intentions in a large and diverse sample recruited online.

methodsThe sample included 1,432 current ENDS users, ages 18-64, drawn from a national online survey conducted in 2016. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were used.

resultsThe sample included participants in the following age groups: 18-24 (17.5%), 25-34 (38.6%), 35-44 (23.3%), and 45-64 (20.7%). With multiple adjustments, the 18-24 age group was more likely to vape for reasons such as flavors or friends' use, and to use multiple flavors and products with varying nicotine content. For example, the odds (95% CI) of vaping initiation due to flavor attraction vs. other reasons in the 18-24 age group were 1.40 (1.02-1.92), 2.73 (1.85-3.99), and 2.12 (1.41-3.18) compared to the 25-34, 35-44, and 45-64 age groups, respectively. In contrast, compared to older age groups, the 18-24 age group was less likely to use ENDS as an alternative to cigarettes or as a quitting device; they also used ENDS less frequently and perceived less health benefit of ENDS use. The 18-24 age group, especially those who had only used ENDS, had the lowest odds of likely quitting use of tobacco/nicotine products compared to other groups (lower by 44-73%).

conclusionThere were significant age differences in ENDS usage motivations and behaviors, perceived health benefit, and quit intentions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntentionMotivationAdolescentAdultAge FactorsElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleFlavoring AgentsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmoking CessationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultFlavoring AgentsE-cigarettesENDSFlavorsIntention to quitVaping initiationYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID31336264
PMCPMC12917943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.