ArticlePeptides2019
Understanding interactions of Citropin 1.1 analogues with model membranes and their influence on biological activity.
Article in Peptides, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Membrane-Targeted Consequences of Acetaminophen Toxicity and Off-Target Effects of Antimicrobial Peptides on Host Cell Membranes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Enhanced antibacterial activity of antimicrobial peptide-antibiotic combinations against multidrug-resistant bacteria.FEMS microbes · 2026Review
- Structural and Functional Versatility of the Amyloidogenic Non-Amidated Variant of the Antimicrobial Peptide Citropin 1.3.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Short Antimicrobial Peptide Derived from the Venom Gland Transcriptome ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Synthesis of vancomycin fluorescent probes that retain antimicrobial activity, identify Gram-positive bacteria, and detect Gram-negative outer membrane damage.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Overcoming Methicillin-ResistanceAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Antimicrobial Mechanisms and Clinical Application Prospects of Antimicrobial Peptides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid emergence of resistant bacterial strains has made the search for new antibacterial agents an endeavor of paramount importance. Cationic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have the ability to kill resistant pathogens while diminishing the development of resistance. Citropin 1.1 (Cit 1.1) is an AMP effective against a broad range of pathogens. 20 analogues of Cit 1.1 were prepared to understand how sequence variations lead to changes in structure and biological activity. Various analogues exhibited an increased antimicrobial activity relative to Cit 1.1. The two most promising, AMP-016 (W3F) and AMP-017 (W3F, D4R, K7R) presented a 2- to 8-fold increase in activity against MRSA (both = 4 μg/mL). AMP-017 was active against E. coli (4 μg/mL), K. pneumoniae (8 μg/mL), and A. baumannii (2 μg/mL). NMR studies indicated that Cit 1.1 and its analogues form a head-to-tail helical dimer in a membrane environment, which differs from a prior study by Sikorska et al. Active peptides displayed a greater tendency to form α-helices and to dimerize when in contact with a negatively-charged membrane. Antimicrobial activity was observed to correlate to the overall stability of the α-helix and to a positively charged N-terminus. Biologically active AMPs were shown by SEM and flow cytometry to disrupt membranes in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria through a proposed carpet mechanism. Notably, active peptides exhibited typical serum stabilities and a good selectivity for bacterial cells over mammalian cells, which supports the potential use of Cit 1.1 analogues as a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic for drug-resistant bacterial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.