Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31335896›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Reduced social participation among seniors with self-reported visual impairment and glaucoma.

Shicheng Jin, Graham E Trope, Yvonne M Buys, Elizabeth M Badley, Kednapa Thavorn, Peng Yan, Harrish Nithianandan, Ya-Ping Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Midlife Vision Impairment and Cognitive Function in Later Life: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, Michigan Cohort.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Optical Coherence Tomography and Glaucoma.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review
  18. Association between ActiveMicroorganisms · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shicheng JinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5241-9696
Graham E TropeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Yvonne M BuysDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Elizabeth M BadleyDivision of Health Care and Outcomes Research, Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Peng YanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Harrish NithianandanFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Ya-Ping JinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

CIHR HRA 126901CIHR SEC 117120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSocial participation benefits health. We assessed the relationship between self-reported visual impairment (VI) and glaucoma versus seniors' social participation.

methodsData from individuals aged ≥65 years responding to the Canadian Community Health Survey Healthy Aging 2008/2009 (n = 16,369) was analyzed. Participation in eight social activities by seniors with and without self-reported VI or glaucoma was compared.

resultsSeniors with VI had significantly reduced participation (p<0.05) in sports/physical activities (18.0% vs. 33.6%), family/friendship activities outside the household (39.7% vs. 53.0%), service club/fraternal organization activities (11.4% vs. 18.4%), volunteer/charity work (13.4% vs. 24.9%), educational/cultural activities (16.2% vs. 24.5%), and other social recreational activities (21.6% vs. 31.0%) compared to those without VI. Differences in participation in church/religious activities (40.6% vs. 44.5%) and community/professional association activities (15.3% vs. 18.0%) were non-significant between seniors with and without VI. Seniors with glaucoma versus those without had significantly reduced participation (p<0.05) in family/friendship activities (46.6% vs. 52.9%), sports/physical activities (26.0% vs. 33.6%) and volunteer/charity work (20.4% vs. 24.9%). No participation in any social activity was significantly higher among seniors with VI versus those without (10.1% vs. 2.9%, p<0.05), but was similar among seniors with and without glaucoma (3.9% vs. 3.1%, p>0.05). After adjusting for the effects of age, sex, education, household income, ethnicity, job status and chronic diseases (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 3.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-5.8), seniors with VI but no glaucoma were more likely not to engage in any social activities compared to seniors without VI and no glaucoma. Seniors with glaucoma but without VI had a similar level of non-participation (aOR = 0.9, 95%% CI 0.5-1.7).

conclusionsSignificantly reduced social participation was found across six community activities among seniors with self-reported VI and in three activities among those with self-reported glaucoma. Policies and programs that help seniors with VI or glaucoma engage in social activities are needed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAgingCanadaCataractCognitive DysfunctionFemaleGlaucomaHumansMalePublic PolicySelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID31335896
PMCPMC6650048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.