Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31335860›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2019

Natural History of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Diagnosed During Observation of Other Organ Cancers.

Yutaka Okagawa, Tomohiro Kondo, Yasushi Tsuji, Toshizo Takayama, Shutaro Oiwa, Masahiro Yoshida, Hideyuki Ihara, Tetsuya Sumiyoshi, Michiaki Hirayama, Hitoshi Kondo

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yutaka OkagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomohiro KondoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yasushi TsujiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Toshizo TakayamaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shutaro OiwaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masahiro YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hideyuki IharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tetsuya SumiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Michiaki HirayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hitoshi KondoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tonan Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a rapidly progressive malignancy that exhibits an extremely poor prognosis, with most cases diagnosed at an advanced stage. To date, few reports have explored the natural history of PDAC, and the period leading up to the detection of PDAC as a tumor with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) remains unclear. Here, we report 3 PDAC cases diagnosed incidentally by repeating imaging examinations during observation of other organ cancers. CASE REPORT Two patients were undergoing postoperative follow-up for colorectal cancer; owing to the elevation of serum CA19-9 or dilatation of the main pancreatic duct, both cases were finally diagnosed with PDAC. Another patient was administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a gastrointestinal stromal tumor; the fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the pancreas with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the treatment assessment led to the diagnosis of PDAC. All patients underwent frequent CECT for assessment of other diseases, and PDAC became visible with CECT within 3-4 months of the appearance of indirect findings of PDAC. CONCLUSIONS The period leading up to the detection of PDAC as a tumor with CECT was approximately 3-4 months. These cases suggest that additional imaging examinations should be performed when the indirect findings of PDAC are noted. This report adds value to the literature by elucidating the natural course of PDAC.

Indexed as

AgedCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalColonic NeoplasmsContrast MediaGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansIncidental FindingsMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyPancreatic NeoplasmsSigmoid NeoplasmsCA-19-9 AntigenContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID31335860
PMCPMC6668584
OpenAlexW2963416188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.