Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31335700›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2019

Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting preterm delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bo Wang, Yong Zhang, Shuangshuang Chen, Xiaowei Xiang, Juan Wen, Mei Yi, Baiyun He, Bing Hu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ultrasound Elastography in Benign Gynecology: A Scoping Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Preterm Birth: Screening and Prediction.International journal of women's health · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Menstrual Pain and Elasticity of Uterine Cervix.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bo WangDepartment of Ultrasonic Imaging, Affiliated Renhe Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang.
Yong ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou.
Shuangshuang ChenDepartment of Ultrasonic Imaging, Affiliated Renhe Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang.
Xiaowei XiangDepartment of Ultrasonic Imaging, Affiliated Renhe Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang.
Juan WenDepartment of Ultrasonic Imaging, Affiliated Renhe Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang.
Mei YiDepartment of Ultrasonic Imaging, Affiliated Renhe Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang.
Baiyun HeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Renhe Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, PR China.
Bing HuDepartment of Ultrasonic Imaging, Affiliated Renhe Hospital of China Three Gorges University, Yichang.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting preterm delivery (PTD).

methodsWe searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies that applied ultrasound (US) elastography to assess cervical stiffness and predict PTD. All the studies were published before December 11, 2018, and only studies published in English were collected. The cervical length (CL) was considered a comparator, and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was applied to assess the quality of the included studies. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) modeling was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of cervical elastography in predicting PTD. Subgroup analyses were also performed.

resultsSeven studies, including 1488 pregnant women, were included in this meta-analysis. Cervical elastography showed a summary sensitivity of 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68, 0.93], a specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.93), a diagnostic odds ratio of 25 (95% CI: 7, 93), and an area under the curve (AUC) of SROC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93). CL measurement showed that the AUC of SROC was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.56-0.64). The results of subgroup analysis showed that the summary sensitivity and specificity were different in the QUADAS-2 score subgroups.

conclusionCervical elastography is a promising and reliable method to predict PTD. Cervical elastography showed better diagnostic performance to predict PTD than CL measurement.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriDimensional Measurement AccuracyElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPremature Birth

Identifiers

PMID31335700
PMCPMC6708731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.