Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31334903›Full record

Observational studyColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2020

Urinary dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.

L Karlsson, D Bock, D Asplund, B Ohlsson, J Rosenberg, E Angenete

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.South Asian journal of cancer · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Establishment of a nurse-led clinic for late complications after colorectal and anal cancer surgery: a descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

L KarlssonDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
D BockDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
D AsplundDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
B OhlssonDepartment of Surgery, Blekinge Hospital, Karlshamn, Sweden.
J RosenbergDepartment of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
E AngeneteDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9966-4904
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEBlekingesjukhuset · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimUrinary dysfunction is one of many complications after treatment for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of patient-reported urinary dysfunction at the time of diagnosis and at 1-year follow-up and to assess the risk factors linked to urinary incontinence.

methodPatients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer were included in the QoLiRECT study between 2012 and 2015. Questionnaires from the time of diagnosis and 1-year follow-up were analysed, with 1085 and 916 patients, respectively, eligible for analysis. Regression analyses were made to investigate possible risk factors for incontinence. The patient cohort was also compared with a cohort from the Swedish general population.

resultsAt baseline, the prevalence of urinary dysfunction (14% of women, 8% of men) was similar to that in the general population. At 1-year follow-up, 20% of patients experienced urinary incontinence (29% of women, 14% of men). Emptying difficulties were experienced by 46% (41% of women, 49% of men) and urgency by 58% across both sexes. Abdominoperineal excision and urinary dysfunction at baseline were found to be independent risk factors for incontinence at 1-year follow-up. Among patients who were continent at baseline, risk factors were female sex, physical inactivity at baseline, comorbidity and abdominoperineal excision.

conclusionUrinary dysfunction is frequent among patients with rectal cancer, with up to a two-fold increase in symptoms 1 year after diagnosis. Unfortunately, few factors are modifiable and these results stress the importance of informing patients of possible outcomes related to urinary dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrevalenceProctectomyProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsUrinary IncontinenceUrination DisordersPROMrectal cancerUrinary dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID31334903
PMCPMC6973078
OpenAlexW2963003802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.