Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31334832›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2019

Geographic contrasts between pre- and postzygotic barriers are consistent with reinforcement in Heliconius butterflies.

Neil Rosser, Lucie M Queste, Bruna Cama, Nathaniel B Edelman, Florian Mann, Ronald Mori Pezo, Jake Morris, Carolina Segami, Patricia Velado, Stefan Schulz and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How Important Is Sexual Isolation to Speciation?Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Pervasive mimicry in flight behavior among aposematic butterflies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Neil RosserDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Lucie M QuesteDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7402-8079
Bruna CamaDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Nathaniel B EdelmanDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138.ORCID 0000-0002-5142-6760
Florian MannInstitut für Organische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hagenring 30, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany.
Ronald Mori PezoURKU Estudios Amazónicos, Jr. Saposoa 181, Tarapoto, San Martín, Perú.
Jake MorrisDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Carolina SegamiDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18d, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9885-1537
Patricia VeladoDepartment for Quality Assurance Analytics, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Lange Point 6, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Stefan SchulzInstitut für Organische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hagenring 30, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4810-324X
James L B MalletDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138.
Kanchon K DasmahapatraDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Harvard University · USUniversity of York · GBTechnische Universität Braunschweig · DEBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture · DEHealth First · USUppsala University · SE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Schu984/12-1Natural Environment Research Council NE/K012886/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the traits causing reproductive isolation and the order in which they evolve is fundamental to understanding speciation. Here, we quantify prezygotic and intrinsic postzygotic isolation among allopatric, parapatric, and sympatric populations of the butterflies Heliconius elevatus and Heliconius pardalinus. Sympatric populations from the Amazon (H. elevatus and H. p. butleri) exhibit strong prezygotic isolation and rarely mate in captivity; however, hybrids are fertile. Allopatric populations from the Amazon (H. p. butleri) and Andes (H. p. sergestus) mate freely when brought together in captivity, but the female F1 hybrids are sterile. Parapatric populations (H. elevatus and H. p. sergestus) exhibit both assortative mating and sterility of female F1s. Assortative mating in sympatric populations is consistent with reinforcement in the face of gene flow, where the driving force, selection against hybrids, is due to disruption of mimicry and other ecological traits rather than hybrid sterility. In contrast, the lack of assortative mating and hybrid sterility observed in allopatric populations suggests that geographic isolation enables the evolution of intrinsic postzygotic reproductive isolation. Our results show how the types of reproductive barriers that evolve between species may depend on geography.

Indexed as

Gene FlowGenetic SpeciationReproductive IsolationAnimalsBoliviaBrazilButterfliesClimateEcosystemFemaleFrench GuianaGeographyHybridization, GeneticMalePeruPhenotypePheromonesButterfliesgene flowhybrid sterilityprezygotic isolationspeciation

Identifiers

PMID31334832
PMCPMC6771877
OpenAlexW2964279949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.