Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31334793›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2019

Effect of Filgotinib vs Placebo on Clinical Response in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy: The FINCH 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mark C Genovese, Kenneth Kalunian, Jacques-Eric Gottenberg, Neelufar Mozaffarian, Beatrix Bartok, Franziska Matzkies, Jie Gao, Ying Guo, Chantal Tasset, John S Sundy and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02873936 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib Administered for 24 Weeks in Combination With Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug), which is not on this map. Cited by 174 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
34.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02873936 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib Administered for 24 Weeks in Combination With Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug(s) (csDMARDs) to Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Biologic DMARD(s) Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorGilead SciencesRan2016 to 2018Enrolled449ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsFilgotinib, Placebo to match filgotinib, csDMARDs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 317 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Mark C GenoveseDivision of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Kenneth KalunianDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Jacques-Eric GottenbergDepartment of Rheumatology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Neelufar MozaffarianGilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, California.
Beatrix BartokGilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, California.
Franziska MatzkiesGilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, California.
Jie GaoGilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, California.
Ying GuoGilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, California.
Chantal TassetGalapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium.
John S SundyGilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, California.
Kurt de VlamDepartment of Rheumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
David WalkerNorthumbria Healthcare, North Shields, United Kingdom.
Tsutomu TakeuchiDivision of Rheumatology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Gilead Sciences (United States) · USGalapagos (Belgium) · BEKeio University · JPNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBStanford University · USUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy need treatment options. Objective: To evaluate the effects of filgotinib vs placebo on the signs and symptoms of RA in a treatment-refractory population. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 trial conducted from July 2016 to June 2018 at 114 sites internationally, randomizing 449 adult patients (and treating 448) with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response/intolerance to 1 or more prior bDMARDs. Interventions: Filgotinib, 200 mg (n = 148); filgotinib, 100 mg (n = 153); or placebo (n = 148) once daily; patients continued concomitant stable conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12. Secondary outcomes included week 12 assessments of low disease activity (disease activity score in 28 joints-C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] ≤3.2) and change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores, as well as week 24 assessment of remission (DAS28-CRP <2.6) and adverse events. Results: Among 448 patients who were treated (mean [SD] age, 56 [12] years; 360 women [80.4%]; mean [SD] DAS28-CRP score, 5.9 [0.96]; 105 [23.4%] with ≥3 prior bDMARDs), 381 (85%) completed the study. At week 12, more patients receiving filgotinib, 200 mg (66.0%) or 100 mg (57.5%), achieved ACR20 response (placebo, 31.1%; difference vs placebo: 34.9% [95% CI, 23.5%-46.3%] and 26.4% [95% CI, 15.0%-37.9%], respectively; both P < .001), including among patients with prior exposure to 3 or more bDMARDs (70.3%, 58.8%, and 17.6%, respectively; difference vs placebo: 52.6% [95% CI, 30.3%-75.0%] for filgotinib, 200 mg, and 41.2% [95% CI, 17.3%-65.0%] for filgotinib, 100 mg; both P < .001). The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (10.2%) for filgotinib, 200 mg; headache, nasopharyngitis, and upper respiratory infection (5.9% each) for filgotinib, 100 mg; and RA (6.1%) for placebo. Four uncomplicated herpes zoster cases and 1 retinal vein occlusion were reported with filgotinib; there were no opportunistic infections, active tuberculosis, malignancies, gastrointestinal perforations, or deaths. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with active RA who had an inadequate response or intolerance to 1 or more bDMARDs, filgotinib, 100 mg daily or 200 mg daily, compared with placebo resulted in a significantly greater proportion achieving a clinical response at week 12. However, further research is needed to assess longer-term efficacy and safety. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02873936.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug ToleranceFemaleHematologic TestsHumansInfectionsJanus Kinase 1MaleMiddle AgedAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinGLPG0634Janus Kinase 1PyridinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID31334793
PMCPMC6652745
OpenAlexW2962938985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.