SynthesisDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2020
Effects of upper extremity surgery on activities and participation of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate and synthesize the evidence for effects of upper extremity surgery (UES) on activities and participation of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).
methodThe databases MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched for publications up to September 2018. Studies included were comparative studies with or without concurrent comparison groups or case series with pretest/posttest outcomes with a minimal sample size of 10 participants; those that reported the effects of UES with a follow-up time of at least 5 months; those including patients diagnosed with CP aged up to 20 years; and those that used a validated activity-based instrument. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool and quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
resultsTwelve studies, involving 310 children and adolescents, were included. The ability and perception of the patient to use the hand(s) and perform activities (measured with the Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation, Assisting Hand Assessment, and House Functional Classification) improved significantly after UES. The quality of evidence was very low for each of the activity outcomes of interest.
interpretationThe very low evidence prohibits recommendations on the use of UES to guide clinical practice. More high-quality comparative studies are needed to obtain better insight into the effects of UES on activities and participation. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Low quality of evidence for effects of upper extremity surgery (UES) on activities and participation. Limited evidence for improvement in activities and participation after UES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.