Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31334417›Full record

ArticleVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2019

Devices for endoscopic hemostasis of nonvariceal GI bleeding (with videos).

ASGE technology committee, Mansour A Parsi, Allison R Schulman, Harry R Aslanian, Manoop S Bhutani, Kuman Krishnan, David R Lichtenstein, Joshua Melson, Udayakumar Navaneethan, Rahul Pannala and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06393907 (A Randomized Trial of Hemostatic Forceps Versus Bipolar Electrocautery Probes for High-Risk Bleeding Gastroduodenal Ulcers), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06393907 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Trial of Hemostatic Forceps Versus Bipolar Electrocautery Probes for High-Risk Bleeding Gastroduodenal Ulcers

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsGastroduodenal UlcerArmsHemostatic Forceps, Bipolar Electrocautery Probes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoscopic Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hemostatic Use of Over-the-Scope Clips in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Narrative Review.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Role of clips, devices and sprays in endoscopic hemostasis: An update (with videos).Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Use of spray coagulation in first-space endoscopy: a case series.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024
    Article
  14. Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Its Endoscopic Management.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

ASGE technology committee
Mansour A ParsiSection for Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA.
Allison R SchulmanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Harry R AslanianSection of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Manoop S BhutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX.
Kuman KrishnanDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
David R LichtensteinDivision of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Joshua MelsonDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Udayakumar NavaneethanCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL.
Rahul PannalaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ.
Amrita SethiDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Guru TrikudanathanDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Arvind J TrindadeZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY.
Rabindra R WatsonInterventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
John T MapleDivision of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
ASGE Technology Committee Chair
Sage (United Kingdom) · GBAdventHealth Orlando · USBoston Medical Center · USNorthwell Health · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic intervention is often the first line of therapy for GI nonvariceal bleeding. Although some of the devices and techniques used for this purpose have been well studied, others are relatively new, with few available outcomes data.

methodsIn this document, we review devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of nonvariceal GI bleeding, the evidence regarding their efficacy and safety, and financial considerations for their use.

resultsDevices used for endoscopic hemostasis in the GI tract can be classified into injection devices (needles), thermal devices (multipolar/bipolar probes, hemostatic forceps, heater probe, argon plasma coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, and cryotherapy), mechanical devices (clips, suturing devices, banding devices, stents), and topical devices (hemostatic sprays).

conclusionsEndoscopic evaluation and treatment remains a cornerstone in the management of nonvariceal upper- and lower-GI bleeding. A variety of devices is available for hemostasis of bleeding lesions in the GI tract. Other than injection therapy, which should not be used as monotherapy, there are few compelling data that strongly favor any one device over another. For endoscopists, the choice of a hemostatic device should depend on the type and location of the bleeding lesion, the availability of equipment and expertise, and the cost of the device.

Indexed as

ABS, Ankaferd blood stopperAPC, argon plasma coagulationASGE, American Society for Gastrointestinal EndoscopyCPT, Current Procedural TerminologyCSEMS, covered self-expandable metallic stentEBL, endoscopic band ligationEDP, endoscopic Doppler probeGAVE, gastric antral vascular ectasiaHP, heater probeLGIB, lower GI bleedingMPEC, multipolar electrocoagulationOTSC, over-the-scope clipPTFE, polytetrafluoroethyleneRCT, randomized controlled trialTTS, through-the-scopeUGIB, upper GI bleedingU.S. FDA, United States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID31334417
PMCPMC6616320
OpenAlexW2953454207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.