Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31334296›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2019

Impact of Initial Antifungal Therapy on the Outcome of Patients With Candidemia and Septic Shock Admitted to Medical Wards: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis.

Marco Falcone, Giusy Tiseo, Belen Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Giammarco Raponi, Paolo Carfagna, Chiara Rosin, Roberto Luzzati, Diego Delle Rose, Massimo Andreoni, Alessio Farcomeni and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Role of liposomal amphotericin B in intensive care unit: an expert opinion paper.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. The FVirulence · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Mortality-associated factors of candidemia: a multi-center prospective cohort in Turkey.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fatal fungemia by biofilm-producingLe infezioni in medicina · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco FalconeDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giusy TiseoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Belen Gutiérrez-GutiérrezUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla/Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Sevilla, Spain.
Giammarco RaponiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo CarfagnaSan Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Chiara RosinUniversity Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Roberto LuzzatiUniversity Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Diego Delle RoseClinical Infectious Diseases, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Massimo AndreoniClinical Infectious Diseases, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Alessio FarcomeniDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mario VendittiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Jesus Rodríguez-BañoUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena/Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Sevilla/Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS), Sevilla, Spain.
Francesco MenichettiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
GISA (Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship)
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla · ESUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Trieste · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEchinocandins are recommended as firstline therapy in patients with candidemia. However, there is debate on their efficacy in survival outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the choice of initial antifungal therapy improves mortality in patients with candidemia in relation to the presence of septic shock.

methodsPatients with candidemia hospitalized in internal medicine wards of 5 tertiary care centers were included in the study (December 2012-December 2014). Patient characteristics, therapeutic interventions, and outcome were reviewed. Propensity score (PS) was used as a covariate of the multivariate analysis to perform a stratified analysis according to PS quartiles and to match patients receiving "echinocandins" or "azoles."

resultsOverall, 439 patients with candidemia were included in the study. A total of 172 (39.2%) patients had septic shock. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with septic shock (45.3%) compared with those without septic shock (31.5%;

conclusionsEchinocandin therapy seems not to improve the outcome of non-intensive care unit patients with septic shock due to candidemia. These findings support the urgent need of further studies in this patient population.

Indexed as

candidemiaearly antifungal therapyechinocandinsseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID31334296
PMCPMC6634434
OpenAlexW2956925510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.