ArticleReports of biochemistry & molecular biology2019
Application of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification in Determining the Copy Number Alterations of
Article in Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expression of ERBB gene family in females with breast cancer and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics of the disease.Molecular biology reports · 2022Article
- O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase and ATP-Binding Cassette Membrane Transporter G2 Promotor Methylation: Can Predict the Response to Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer?Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2022Article
- Copy Number Variation and Rearrangements Assessment in Cancer: Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR with the Current Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the usability of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for copy number determination of
methodsClinical and immunohistochemical characteristics were assessed in 104 BC patients and the molecular subtype was determined for each tumor sample. Furthermore, HER-2/neu status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and equivocal results were confirmed by Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). The copy numbers of
resultsTwenty-five percent of all patients showed
conclusionAccording to our findings, MLPA is a fast, precise and low-cost technique to detect
Indexed as
Identifiers
31334294PMC6590940W2948179226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.