ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2019
Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine: A hospital-based cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of General Neurologists and Headache Experts Toward Migraine Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study in India.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2026Article
- Prediction of medication overuse in patients with migraine using cox regression and machine learning: a real-world cohort.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Migraine care in the digital era: social listening insights and neurologists' perspectives from Türkiye.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Article
- Consistency between headache diagnoses and ICHD-3 criteria across different levels of care.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Article
- Unmet needs in the management of migraine in Greece from the perspective of medical experts: a Delphi consensus.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Unmet Needs of Patients Living with Migraine in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries.Pain and therapy · 2024Review
- Factors Associated with Over-the-Counter Analgesic Overuse among Individuals Experiencing Headache.Clinics and practice · 2022Article
- Translation and Validation of ID-Migraine Questionnaire to North-Indian Vernacular Languages.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextMigraine is common debilitating disorders, affecting 10 to 20% of the world's population. However, proper diagnosis is delayed due to many factors.
aimsTo determine various factors associated with delayed diagnosis of migraine. SETTINGS AND
designHospital-based cross-sectional study. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients attending Neurology OPD of AIIMS Bhopal and satisfying diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (ICHD-3β) for migraine were selected for study. MIDAS, MINI, and ROME-III were used. First diagnosis was considered as "Appropriate" if patients were previously diagnosed as "migraine" or getting treatment for it; otherwise labeled as "Inappropriate." STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Associations were tested by Chi-square,
resultsHundred patients (female = 77) of migraine were included. Mean age (SD) was 32.42 (10.74). Diagnosis was "inappropriate" in 65 patients. Number of inappropriate diagnosis/appropriate diagnosis was 10/40 (25%) by neurologists; 35/39 (89.3%) by physicians; 18/18 (100%) by ophthalmologists. Factors associated with "Inappropriate Diagnosis" were "Neurologist vs Other Doctors" {10 (25%) vs 55 (91.7%),
conclusionDelayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis is very frequent in migraine, leading to financial burden to patients. Management of common disorders like migraine should be addressed in undergraduate medical teaching curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.