ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2019
Outcome of Beveled versus Vertical IncisionTechnique after Reconstructive or Aesthetic Facial Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beveled vs. perpendicular skin incisions on the back: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Beveled vs. Perpendicular Incisions and The Effects on Wound Healing: A Review.Surgery in practice and science · 2023Review
- An Algorithm for Prevention of Unsightly Facial Scars Considering the Newest Research Insights.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe suggest that the degree of scar improvement with a beveled incision technique with an angle of about 20 degrees to the skin can be translated for various reconstructions on the face and can be verified by a validated clinical assessment scale and histology.
methodsA total of 5 patients (2 men and 3 women) with a mean age of 68 years (range 54-84 years) undergoing elective surgeries on the face for tumor excision or cosmetic procedures were included. The beveled incision technique was compared with the conventional vertical incision (control group). Outcome measures were major and minor complications, pain and scar quality using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and histomorphologic scar assessment.
resultsAfter a mean follow-up of 7.6 months (range 6-13 months), all patients healed uneventfully without pain, hypertrophic scars, or infection. We found a better overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score in the beveled incision technique group (15 ± 3.4) compared with the conventional vertical incision group (18.4 ± 7.8,
conclusionWe showed that the beveled incision technique using a 20-degree angle in elective surgeries on the face yields a cosmetic pleasant result for both the patient and the surgeon, which also goes in line with our histomorphologic analyses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.