ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2019
Computational Analysis of the Mature Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity on Nasal Patency.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nasal airway obstruction in patients with cleft lip nasal deformity: A systematic review.Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2024Pooled it
- Finite Element Analysis in Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: A Narrative Review from Biomechanical Insights to Clinical Translation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Nasal Airflow Dynamics following LeFort I Advancement in Cleft Nasal Deformities: A Retrospective Preliminary Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Olfactory drug delivery with intranasal sprays after nasal midvault reconstruction.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- A systematic analysis of surgical interventions for the airway in the mature unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity: a single case study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Thermographic analysis of postoperative changes in the nasal breathing efficiency in infants and young children with unilateral cleft lip.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- Computational Analysis of Olfactory Airspace in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2021Article
- Analysis of nasal air conditioning in subjects with unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2021Article
- Orally Inhaled Drug Particle Transport in Computerized Models of Laryngotracheal Stenosis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application.International journal of oral science · 2020Review
- Characterizing Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformities.Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNasal airway obstruction (NAO) due to nasal anatomic deformities is known to be more common among cleft patients than the general population, yet information is lacking regarding severity and variability of cleft-associated nasal obstruction relative to other conditions causing NAO. This preliminary study compares differences in NAO experienced by unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity (uCLND) subjects with noncleft subjects experiencing NAO.
methodsComputational modeling techniques based on patient-specific computed tomography images were used to quantify the nasal airway anatomy and airflow dynamics in 21 subjects: 5 healthy normal subjects; 8 noncleft NAO subjects; and 8 uCLND subjects. Outcomes reported include Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores, cross-sectional area, and nasal resistance.
resultsuCLND subjects had significantly larger cross-sectional area differences between the left and right nasal cavities at multiple cross sections compared with normal and NAO subjects. Median and interquartile range (IQR) NOSE scores between NAO and uCLND were 75 (IQR = 22.5) and 67.5 (IQR = 30), respectively. Airflow partition difference between both cavities were: median = 9.4%, IQR = 10.9% (normal); median = 31.9%, IQR = 25.0% (NAO); and median = 29.9%, IQR = 44.1% (uCLND). Median nasal resistance difference between left and right nasal cavities were 0.01 pa.s/ml (IQR = 0.03 pa.s/ml) for normal, 0.09 pa.s/ml (IQR = 0.16 pa.s/ml) for NAO and 0.08 pa.s/ml (IQR = 0.25 pa.s/ml) for uCLND subjects.
conclusionsuCLND subjects demonstrated significant asymmetry between both sides of the nasal cavity. Furthermore, there exists substantial disproportionality in flow partition difference and resistance difference between cleft and noncleft sides among uCLND subjects, suggesting that both sides may be dysfunctional.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.