Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31333924›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2019

A Comparative Trial of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Abdominoplasty.

Gerald M Abesamis, Shiv Chopra, Karen Vickery, Anand K Deva

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04455724 (Negative Pressure Incisional Wound Therapy for High-risk Ventral Hernia Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04455724 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Negative Pressure Incisional Wound Therapy for High-risk Ventral Hernia Repair: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled110ConditionsVentral HerniaArmsNegative pressure incisional wound therapy, Standard sterile dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. A Primer on Abdominoplasty Safety.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy at Flap Suture Line: An Innovative Approach for Improving Outcomes in Suboptimal Wound Conditions.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerald M AbesamisDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Shiv ChopraDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Karen VickerySurgical Infection Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Anand K DevaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Macquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The risk for minor local complications for abdominoplasty remains high despite advances in strategies in recent years. The most common complication is the formation of seroma with reported rates ranging from 15% to 40%. The use of incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) on closed surgical sites has been shown to decrease the infection, dehiscence, and seroma rates. Thus, this article aims to determine whether an iNPWT dressing, Prevena Plus, is able to reduce postoperative drainage and seroma formation in patients who undergo abdominoplasty. Sixteen consecutive patients who underwent abdominoplasty by a single surgeon were dressed with standard dressings and iNPWT dressings. Total drain output, day of drain removal, and adverse events were compared between cohorts with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The iNPWT group demonstrated a significantly less amount of fluid drainage with a mean total fluid output of 370 ± 275 ml compared to 1269 ± 436 ml mean total drainage from controls (

Identifiers

PMID31333924
PMCPMC6571337
OpenAlexW2944933554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.